By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Section 69 – Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) – Admission Of Execution By Party To Attested Document.
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > Bare Act > BSA > Section 69 – Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) – Admission Of Execution By Party To Attested Document.
BSA

Section 69 – Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) – Admission Of Execution By Party To Attested Document.

Apni Law
Last updated: April 27, 2025 1:50 pm
Apni Law
6 months ago
Share
Section 69 - Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) - Admission Of Execution By Party To Attested Document
Section 69 - Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) - Admission Of Execution By Party To Attested Document
SHARE

Code: Section 69 – Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (BSA)

The admission of a party to an attested document of its execution by himself
shall be sufficient proof of its execution as against him, though it be a document required by
law to be attested.


Explanation of Section 69 BSA

Section 69 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam deals with a simplified method of proving the execution of an attested document. It provides that if a person who is a party to an attested document admits that they executed the document, then that admission alone is enough to prove the document’s execution as against them—even if the law requires the document to be attested.

Contents
Code: Section 69 – Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (BSA)Explanation of Section 69 BSAKey Points:IllustrationCommon Questions and Answers on Section 69 BSAConclusion

This section serves as an exception to Section 67, which generally requires an attesting witness to be called to prove an attested document. If the party against whom the document is being used acknowledges its execution, then no further proof or witness testimony is needed in that specific context.

This provision saves time and resources in legal proceedings by allowing an admitted fact to be accepted without requiring formal proof.

Key Points:

  • Applies only to the party who admits to executing the document.

  • The document must be attested, but witness testimony is not required if execution is admitted.

  • The admission must clearly relate to the act of executing the document.


Illustration

Example:

A person signs a mortgage deed, which by law must be attested. During a court case, that person admits that they signed the deed. Under Section 69, this admission is sufficient to prove the document’s execution against that person. The other party does not need to call an attesting witness to prove execution.

However, if the same deed is being enforced against another person who has not admitted to signing it, proof under Section 67 or 68 would still be required for that individual.


Common Questions and Answers on Section 69 BSA

  1. What is meant by “execution” of a document? Execution refers to the act of signing or completing a document in a legally valid manner.

  2. Does this section apply if the party denies executing the document? No. Section 69 applies only when the party clearly admits to executing the document.

  3. Is an attesting witness needed if execution is admitted? No. The admission of execution by the party is enough; calling an attesting witness is not necessary in that case.

  4. Does this admission apply to all parties involved in the document? No. It applies only to the party who made the admission. For other parties, proof may still be required under Sections 67 or 68.

  5. Is oral admission enough? Yes, if the admission is clear, unambiguous, and made before the court or established by evidence.


Conclusion

Section 69 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam simplifies the evidentiary process in cases involving attested documents. By allowing the admission of execution by a party to stand as sufficient proof, the law promotes judicial efficiency and reduces unnecessary procedural delays. However, this provision is limited in scope and applies only to the admitting party.

For more insights into legal documentation and the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, visit ApniLaw.

You Might Also Like

Section 113 – Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) – Burden Of Proof As To Ownership.

Section 49 – Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) – Previous Bad Character Not Relevant, Except In Reply.

Section 166 – Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) – Giving, As Evidence, Of Document Called For And Produced On Notice.

Section 23 – Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) – Confession To Police Officer.

Section 13 – Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) – Facts Bearing On Question Whether Act Was Accidental Or Intentional.

Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article High Court of Delhi Online Product Listings Can Be Claimed By Jurisdiction: Delhi High Court Rules
Next Article Section 77 - Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) - Voyeurism Section 77 – Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) – Voyeurism.
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Supreme Court of India
News

Supreme Court Criticises Poor Conditions In Assam’s Detention Centers, Orders Fresh Review

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
12 months ago
Supreme Court Of India Rules Viewing Child Pornography As An offence
Retired Kerala Judge Loses ₹90 Lakh In Share Trading Scam
Dismissal Revokes Pension Rights Under Rule 2.5 of the Punjab Civil Services Rules: Punjab & Haryana High Court
Supreme Court Overturns Bihar Staff Selection Commission Decision, Grants Relief To Candidate
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Cheque Bounce - Negotiable Instruments Act 1881

Defenses Available In Cheque Bounce Cases: How An Accused Can Fight

Cheque Bounce - Negotiable Instruments Act 1881

Difference Between Civil Recovery and Criminal Action in Cheque Bounce Cases Under Negotiable Instruments Act

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?