By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Section 21 – Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) – Admissions In Civil Cases When Relevant.
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > Bare Act > BSA > Section 21 – Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) – Admissions In Civil Cases When Relevant.
BSA

Section 21 – Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) – Admissions In Civil Cases When Relevant.

Apni Law
Last updated: April 15, 2025 11:19 pm
Apni Law
6 months ago
Share
Section 21 - Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) - Admissions In Civil Cases When Relevant
Section 21 - Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) - Admissions In Civil Cases When Relevant
SHARE

Code

In civil cases, no admission is relevant, if it is made either:

  • Upon an express condition that evidence of it is not to be given,
  • Or under circumstances from which the Court can infer that the parties agreed together that evidence of it should not be given.

Explanation:
Nothing in this section shall be taken to exempt any advocate from giving evidence of any matter of which he may be compelled to give evidence under sub-sections (1) and (2) of section 132.

Contents
CodeExplanation Illustration Key Concepts

Explanation

This section protects the confidentiality of settlement talks or private negotiations in civil matters. If parties make an admission during discussions where they clearly stated — or the circumstances clearly show — that the admissions would not be used as evidence, then such admissions cannot be admitted in court.

The idea is to encourage free and honest negotiation without fear of statements being used later against a party.

The section also emphasizes that advocates are not exempt from giving evidence when legally required under Section 132, even if the admission occurred under confidential circumstances.

 Illustration

A and B are involved in a civil dispute. During settlement discussions, A admits fault but says, “This is off the record and cannot be used in court.”
This admission is not relevant or admissible in evidence, as it was made with an express condition of confidentiality.

 Key Concepts

  • Applies only to CIVIL cases.
  • Focuses on conditional or confidential admissions.
  • Protects negotiation integrity.
  • Advocates may still be compelled to testify under certain legal provisions.

You Might Also Like

Section 57 – Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) – Primary Evidence.

Section 119 – Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) – Court May Presume Existence Of Certain Facts.

Section 75 – Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) – Certified Copies Of Public Documents.

Section 99 – Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) – Evidence As To Application Of Language Which Can Apply To One Only Of Several Persons.

Section 131 – Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) – Information As To Commission Of Offences.

Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Section 420 - Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) - Appeal Against Conviction By High Court In Certain Cases Section 420 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) – Appeal Against Conviction By High Court In Certain Cases.
Next Article Allahabad High Court Accused Must Have Lived in Shared Household for Domestic Violence Case:Allahabad High Court
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Child Adoption
Child CustodyFamilyHigh CourtKerala High CourtNews

Step-Parent Adoption Requires Biological Parent’s Consent: Kerala HC

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
5 months ago
Plea Against Multiple FIRs: Supreme Court Issues Notice On Ashish Chanchlani
Accused Must Have Lived in Shared Household for Domestic Violence Case:Allahabad High Court
CIC Criticizes Election Commission’s Delayed Response to RTI Query on EVMs
Watching ‘Child Sex Abuse’ Material a Criminal Offence : SC
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Cheque Bounce - Negotiable Instruments Act 1881

Defenses Available In Cheque Bounce Cases: How An Accused Can Fight

Cheque Bounce - Negotiable Instruments Act 1881

Difference Between Civil Recovery and Criminal Action in Cheque Bounce Cases Under Negotiable Instruments Act

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?