By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Section 354 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – No Influence To Be Used To Induce Disclosure.
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > Bare Act > BNSS > Section 354 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – No Influence To Be Used To Induce Disclosure.
BNSS

Section 354 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – No Influence To Be Used To Induce Disclosure.

Apni Law
Last updated: February 15, 2025 7:07 pm
Apni Law
6 months ago
Share
Section 354 - Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) - No Influence To Be Used To Induce Disclosure
Section 354 - Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) - No Influence To Be Used To Induce Disclosure
SHARE

Code: Section 354 BNSS

No influence to be used to induce disclosure.—Except as provided in sections 343 and 344, no
influence, by means of any promise or threat or otherwise, shall be used to an accused person to induce him to disclose or withhold any matter within his knowledge.


Explanation of Section 354 BNSS

Purpose of This Section

This section aims to protect accused persons from coercion during investigations or trials. It ensures that any information provided by the accused is voluntary and not obtained through threats or inducements.

Key Provisions

  1. Prohibition on Inducing Accused Persons
    • No one, including police officers, investigators, or private individuals, can force an accused to disclose or withhold information.
    • This includes using threats, promises of leniency, or any other influence.
  2. Exceptions – Sections 343 & 344 BNSS
    • The only exceptions to this rule are found in Sections 343 and 344 BNSS, which likely deal with legal procedures for obtaining statements.
  3. Ensures Voluntariness of Confessions
    • Any confession or disclosure made under coercion, threat, or promise of advantage is inadmissible in court under the doctrine of free will.

Illustration

Example 1: Illegal Police Pressure

A suspect in a fraud case is threatened by police officers that he will be denied bail unless he confesses. This violates Section 354 BNSS, and any confession made under such pressure would be inadmissible in court.

Example 2: Promise of Leniency in Exchange for a Statement

A government official accused of corruption is told, “If you admit guilt, we will ensure a lighter sentence.” This inducement violates Section 354 BNSS, and any statement given under such a promise cannot be used as evidence.


Common Questions and Answers on Section 354 BNSS

1. Does this mean an accused person can refuse to answer questions?

Yes, unless required under Sections 343 and 344 BNSS. An accused person cannot be forced to disclose or withhold information.

2. Can the police use psychological pressure without direct threats?

No. Even subtle forms of coercion, like false promises, implied threats, or undue influence, violate Section 354 BNSS.

3. What happens if evidence is obtained through coercion?

  • Any confession or disclosure made under coercion is generally inadmissible in court.
  • If coercion is proven, it may lead to disciplinary action against the responsible officials.

Conclusion

Section 354 BNSS protects the rights of accused persons by ensuring that any disclosure they make is free from coercion or inducement. It reinforces the principle that justice should be fair and voluntary, not forced.

You Might Also Like

CrPC Section 291A: Identification Report by Magistrate

Section 21 – Hindu Marriage Act – Application Of Act 5 Of 1908.

Section 90 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Issue Of Warrant In Lieu Of, Or In Addition To, Summons.

Section 224 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Procedure By Magistrate Not Competent To Take Cognizance Of Case.

Section 126 CrPC: Procedure Explained – Code of Criminal Procedure

TAGGED:CoercionConfessionCriminal JusticeCriminal LawCriminal ProcedureDue ProcessEvidenceEvidence LawJurisprudenceLawLegalLegal RightsProcedural LawRight to CounselRights of the AccusedSelf-IncriminationTrial ProcedureWitness
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Section 349 - Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) - Power Of Magistrate To Order Person To Give Specimen Signatures Or Handwriting, Etc Section 349 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Power Of Magistrate To Order Person To Give Specimen Signatures Or Handwriting, Etc.
Next Article Section 365 - Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) - Conviction Or Commitment On Evidence Partly Recorded By One Magistrate And Partly By Another Section 365 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Conviction Or Commitment On Evidence Partly Recorded By One Magistrate And Partly By Another.
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Supreme Court To Examine Right To Be Forgotten In Court Judgments
News

Supreme Court To Examine Right To Be Forgotten In Court Judgments

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
11 months ago
Supreme Court PIL Seeks Indian Army Deployment For Landslide Rescue On NH 66 In Karnataka
Supreme Court Clarifies Pay Parity, Rules On UP Education Officials’ Pay Scales
Consensual Love Among Teenagers Should Not Be Criminalized Under POCSO: Delhi HC
Father-in-law Has The Right To Evict His Son-in-law From His Property: Madhya Pradesh HC
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Prisoner Freed Despite Missing File By Calcutta High Court

Punishment and Legal Action Under Section 6 of Indecent Representation of Women Act

Media & Entertainment Law: Career Insights And Opportunities

What Content Is Banned and What’s Allowed Under the Indecent Representation of Women Act? (Sections 3, 4 and 5)

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?