By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Section 246 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – What Persons May Be Charged Jointly.
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > Bare Act > BNSS > Section 246 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – What Persons May Be Charged Jointly.
BNSS

Section 246 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – What Persons May Be Charged Jointly.

Apni Law
Last updated: February 27, 2025 2:03 pm
Apni Law
6 months ago
Share
Section 246 - Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) - What Persons May Be Charged Jointly
Section 246 - Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) - What Persons May Be Charged Jointly
SHARE

Code:

The following persons may be charged and tried together, namely:—

(a) persons accused of the same offence committed in the course of the same transaction;

(b) persons accused of an offence and persons accused of abetment of, or attempt to commit, such offence;

(c) persons accused of more than one offence of the same kind, within the meaning of section 242 committed by them jointly within the period of twelve months;

(d) persons accused of different offences committed in the course of the same transaction;

(e) persons accused of an offence which includes theft, extortion, cheating, or criminal misappropriation, and persons accused of receiving or retaining, or assisting in the disposal or concealment of, property possession of which is alleged to have been transferred by any such offence committed by the first-named persons, or of abetment of or attempting to commit any such last-named offence;

(f) persons accused of offences under sub-sections (2) and (5) of section 317 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 or either of those sections in respect of stolen property the possession of which has been transferred by one offence;

(g) persons accused of any offence under Chapter X of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 relating to counterfeit coin and persons accused of any other offence under the said Chapter relating to the same coin, or of abetment of or attempting to commit any such offence; and the provisions contained in the former part of this Chapter shall, so far as may be, apply to all such charges:

Provided that where a number of persons are charged with separate offences and such persons do not fall within any of the categories specified in this section, the Magistrate or Court of Session may, if such persons by an application in writing, so desire, and if he or it is satisfied that such persons would not be prejudicially affected thereby, and it is expedient so to do, try all such persons together.

Explanation:

Section 246 of the BNSS outlines specific situations where multiple individuals can be charged and tried together. This is known as a ‘joint trial’. The rationale behind joint trials is to promote efficiency and reduce the burden on the judicial system. However, the law carefully defines the circumstances under which such trials are permissible to ensure fairness and prevent undue prejudice to the accused.

Illustrations:

  • (a) Same Offence, Same Transaction: If two individuals are accused of robbing a bank together, they can be tried jointly as they are accused of the same offence (robbery) committed during the same transaction.
  • (b) Offence and Abetment: If one person commits murder and another person aided or encouraged the murder, they can be tried together. The first person is accused of the offence (murder), and the second person is accused of abetment.
  • (c) Multiple Offences of Same Kind: If two individuals commit multiple thefts within a 12-month period, they can be tried jointly as they are accused of offences of the same kind (theft) committed together.
  • (d) Different Offences, Same Transaction: If one person commits robbery and another person commits assault during the same robbery incident, they can be tried together as their offences occurred in the same transaction.
  • (e) Offence and Receiving Stolen Property: If one person steals a car and another person knows the car was stolen and assists in hiding it, they can be tried together. The first person is accused of the offence (theft), and the second person is accused of receiving or concealing stolen property.
  • (f) Offences Relating to Stolen Property: If one person steals a necklace and another person receives it, they can be tried together under sections related to theft and receiving stolen property.
  • (g) Counterfeit Coin Offences: If one person makes counterfeit coins and another person uses them, they can be tried together under the relevant sections on counterfeit currency.

Common Questions and Answers:

  • Q: Can anyone be tried together?
  • A: No, only individuals falling under the categories mentioned in Section 246 can be tried jointly. The law aims to prevent unrelated offences from being combined in a single trial.
  • Q: What if the accused don’t want a joint trial?
  • A: If individuals do not want to be tried together, they can make a written application to the Magistrate or Court of Session. The court will consider their request and decide whether a separate trial is necessary to avoid prejudice.
  • Q: What are the advantages of a joint trial?
  • A: Joint trials can save time and resources by consolidating evidence and witness testimony. They also help in providing a more complete picture of the events involved in a case.

“`

Contents
Code:Explanation:Illustrations:Common Questions and Answers:

You Might Also Like

CrPC Section 450: Levy of Amount Due on Recognizances – Explained

Section 192 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Diary Of Proceedings In Investigation.

Section 309 CrPC: Postponement & Adjournment of Criminal Proceedings

Section 520 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) – Trials Before High Courts.

Indian Penal Code Section 139: Persons Subject to Certain Acts

TAGGED:2023AbetmentBharatiya Nyaya SanhitaCheatingCounterfeit CoinCourt of SessionCriminal Lawcriminal misappropriationCriminal Procedure CodeextortionIndiaJoint TrialMagistrateOffencesReceiving Stolen PropertyTheft
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Section 240 - Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) - Recall Of Witnesses When Charge Altered Section 240 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Recall Of Witnesses When Charge Altered.
Next Article Section 252 - Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) - Conviction On Plea Of Guilty Section 252 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Conviction On Plea Of Guilty.
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Supreme Court Stays Madras High Court Order For New Investigation In Thoothukudi Police Firing Case
News

Supreme Court Stays Madras High Court Order For New Investigation In Thoothukudi Police Firing Case

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
10 months ago
Supreme Court Clarifies Rules On Citizenship Resumption And Foreign Nationality
Chief Justice Highlights Judicial Process Issues At Special Lok Adalat Event
Not Informing Grounds of Arrest Violates Fundamental Rights Under Article 22: Kerala HC
Married Sister Not Entitled to ‘Loss of Dependency’ Compensation in Motor Accident Case: Kerala High Court Rules
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Prisoner Freed Despite Missing File By Calcutta High Court

Punishment and Legal Action Under Section 6 of Indecent Representation of Women Act

Media & Entertainment Law: Career Insights And Opportunities

What Content Is Banned and What’s Allowed Under the Indecent Representation of Women Act? (Sections 3, 4 and 5)

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?