By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Section 239 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Court May Alter Charge.
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > Bare Act > BNSS > Section 239 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Court May Alter Charge.
BNSS

Section 239 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Court May Alter Charge.

Apni Law
Last updated: February 25, 2025 5:21 pm
Apni Law
7 months ago
Share
Section 239 - Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) - Court May Alter Charge
Section 239 - Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) - Court May Alter Charge
SHARE

Code:

(1) Any Court may alter or add to any charge at any time before judgment is pronounced.

Contents
Code:Explanation:Sub-sections:Illustration:Common Questions & Answers:

(2) Every such alteration or addition shall be read and explained to the accused.

(3) If the alteration or addition to a charge is such that proceeding immediately with the trial is not likely, in the opinion of the Court, to prejudice the accused in his defence or the prosecutor in the conduct of the case, the Court may, in its discretion, after such alteration or addition has been made, proceed with the trial as if the altered or added charge had been the original charge.

(4) If the alteration or addition is such that proceeding immediately with the trial is likely, in the opinion of the Court, to prejudice the accused or the prosecutor as aforesaid, the Court may either direct a new trial or adjourn the trial for such period as may be necessary.

(5) If the offence stated in the altered or added charge is one for the prosecution of which previous sanction is necessary, the case shall not be proceeded with until such sanction is obtained, unless sanction has been already obtained for a prosecution on the same facts as those on which the altered or added charge is founded.

Explanation:

This section deals with the power of the court to alter or add to the charges against an accused person during the trial. It aims to ensure that the charges accurately reflect the evidence presented and that the accused is not prejudiced during the trial process.

Sub-sections:

  • (1) Any Court may alter or add to any charge at any time before judgment is pronounced. This provision empowers the court to make amendments to the charges at any point before the final judgment is given. The court has the flexibility to adjust the charges based on the evidence presented during the trial.
  • (2) Every such alteration or addition shall be read and explained to the accused. The accused must be informed of any changes made to the charges. The court is obligated to read and explain the altered or added charges to the accused to ensure they understand the new accusations against them.
  • (3) If the alteration or addition to a charge is such that proceeding immediately with the trial is not likely, in the opinion of the Court, to prejudice the accused in his defence or the prosecutor in the conduct of the case, the Court may, in its discretion, after such alteration or addition has been made, proceed with the trial as if the altered or added charge had been the original charge. If the court deems that the amendment is minor and unlikely to significantly impact the defense or prosecution, the trial may proceed as if the new charge was the original accusation.
  • (4) If the alteration or addition is such that proceeding immediately with the trial is likely, in the opinion of the Court, to prejudice the accused or the prosecutor as aforesaid, the Court may either direct a new trial or adjourn the trial for such period as may be necessary. If the court believes that the amendment could significantly prejudice the accused or the prosecution, the court may choose to start a completely new trial or adjourn the current trial to allow for necessary adjustments. This ensures a fair trial for both parties.
  • (5) If the offence stated in the altered or added charge is one for the prosecution of which previous sanction is necessary, the case shall not be proceeded with until such sanction is obtained, unless sanction has been already obtained for a prosecution on the same facts as those on which the altered or added charge is founded. In cases where the amended charge involves an offense that requires prior sanction, the trial cannot proceed until the necessary sanction is obtained. However, if sanction was already acquired for a prosecution based on the same facts, the trial can continue without further sanction.

Illustration:

An accused is initially charged with theft. During the trial, evidence suggests that the accused may have also committed robbery. The court can alter the charge to include robbery, provided it complies with the procedural requirements laid out in Section 239. The accused would then be informed of the added charge and given an opportunity to defend themselves against the new accusation.

Common Questions & Answers:

  • Q: Can the court alter the charge even if the accused objects?
  • A: Yes, the court has the power to alter the charges, even if the accused objects. However, the court must ensure that the accused is given a fair opportunity to defend themselves against the altered charges.
  • Q: What if the alteration is significant and the accused needs more time to prepare their defense?
  • A: In such cases, the court can adjourn the trial to allow the accused adequate time to prepare their defense. Alternatively, the court may direct a new trial.
  • Q: Can the court add a new charge without any evidence?
  • A: No, the court should only alter or add charges based on evidence presented during the trial. The addition of a new charge should be supported by evidence that suggests the accused may be guilty of the additional offense.

You Might Also Like

Section 84 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Proclamation For Person Absconding.

IPC 153AA: Promoting Enmity on Grounds of Religion, Race, etc. – Indian Penal Code

IPC Section 189: Threat of Injury to Public Servant in India

Section 32 CrPC: Conferring Powers – Code of Criminal Procedure

Section 14 CrPC: Local Jurisdiction of Judicial Magistrates – India’s Code of Criminal Procedure

TAGGED:AccusedCharge AdditionCharge AlterationCourt ProcedureCriminal LawCriminal ProcedureDefenseJudicial DiscretionNew TrialPrejudiceProsecutorSanctionTrial AdjournmentTrial Procedure
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Section 230 - Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) - Supply To Accused Of Copy Of Police Report And Other Documents Section 230 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Supply To Accused Of Copy Of Police Report And Other Documents.
Next Article Section 241 - Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) - Separate Charges For Distinct Offences Section 241 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Separate Charges For Distinct Offences.
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Chief Justice Of India Inaugurates Vigentennial Celebrations Of Madurai Bench Of Madras High Court
News

Chief Justice Of India Inaugurates Vigentennial Celebrations Of Madurai Bench Of Madras Court

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
11 months ago
Online Product Listings Can Be Claimed By Jurisdiction: Delhi High Court Rules
Child’s Education Should Not Be Disrupted Due To Parental Dispute: Madras High Court Directs Passport Renewal for Minor in the U.S.
Muslim Woman’s Right to Khula Is Absolute, Not Dependent On Husband’s Consent: Telangana HC
Mosque Falls Under ‘Waqf’, Disputes to Be Heard by Waqf Tribunal: Rajasthan HC
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.
login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?