By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Section 181 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Statements To Police And Use Thereof.
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > Bare Act > BNSS > Section 181 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Statements To Police And Use Thereof.
BNSS

Section 181 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Statements To Police And Use Thereof.

Apni Law
Last updated: March 11, 2025 5:06 pm
Apni Law
6 months ago
Share
Section 181 - Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) - Statements To Police And Use Thereof
Section 181 - Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) - Statements To Police And Use Thereof
SHARE

Code:

(1) No statement made by any person to a police officer in the course of an
investigation under this Chapter, shall, if reduced to writing, be signed by the person
making it; nor shall any such statement or any record thereof, whether in a police diary or
otherwise, or any part of such statement or record, be used for any purpose, save as
hereinafter provided, at any inquiry or trial in respect of any offence under investigation at
the time when such statement was made:
Provided that when any witness is called for the prosecution in such inquiry or trial
whose statement has been reduced into writing as aforesaid, any part of his statement, if
duly proved, may be used by the accused, and with the permission of the Court, by the
prosecution, to contradict such witness in the manner provided by section 148 of the
Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023; and when any part of such statement is so used, any
part thereof may also be used in the re-examination of such witness, but for the purpose
only of explaining any matter referred to in his cross-examination.
(2) Nothing in this section shall be deemed to apply to any statement falling within
the provisions of clause (a) of section 26 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023; or to
affect the provisions of the proviso to sub-section (2) of section 23 of that Adhiniyam.
Explanation.—An omission to state a fact or circumstance in the statement referred
to in sub-section (1) may amount to contradiction if the same appears to be significant and
otherwise relevant having regard to the context in which such omission occurs and whether
any omission amounts to a contradiction in the particular context shall be a question of fact.

Contents
Code:Explanation:Illustration:Common Questions and Answers:Q: Can a statement made to a police officer be used as evidence against the accused?Q: What if the statement is signed by the person who made it?Q: Can the statement be used to contradict a witness?

Explanation:

This section deals with the admissibility of statements to police and use thereof during an investigation.

  • It prohibits the use of such statements as evidence against the person who made them, except in certain specific situations.
  • The purpose of this section is to prevent the police from coercing or intimidating suspects into making statements that can be used against them in court.

Provided that when any witness is called for the prosecution in such inquiry or trial whose statement has been reduced into writing as aforesaid, any part of his statement, if duly proved, may be used by the accused, and with the permission of the Court, by the prosecution, to contradict such witness in the manner provided by section 148 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023; and when any part of such statement is so used, any part thereof may also be used in the re-examination of such witness, but for the purpose only of explaining any matter referred to in his cross-examination.

Explanation: This exception allows the use of the statement to contradict a witness who is called for the prosecution. If the witness’s testimony differs from what they told the police, the statement can be used to point out this inconsistency. However, the use of the statement is limited to contradicting the witness and cannot be used as direct evidence against the accused.

(2) Nothing in this section shall be deemed to apply to any statement falling within the provisions of clause (1) of section 26 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023; or to affect the provisions of section 23 of that Adhiniyam.

Explanation: This exception excludes statements that are covered by Section 26(1) and Section 23 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023.

Illustration:

A person is arrested for theft. During the investigation, he makes a statement to the police officer admitting his involvement in the crime. This statement is recorded in writing. However, this statement cannot be used as evidence against him in a subsequent trial, unless it falls under one of the exceptions mentioned in this section.

Common Questions and Answers:

Q: Can a statement made to a police officer be used as evidence against the accused?

A: No, generally not. Section 181 of the BNSS prohibits the use of such statements as evidence against the accused. This is exceptional in the situations specified in the exceptions.

Q: What if the statement is signed by the person who made it?

A: Even if the statement is signed, it cannot be used as evidence against the accused. The statement should fall under one of the exceptions.

Q: Can the statement be used to contradict a witness?

A: Yes, if the witness is called for the prosecution and their testimony differs from their statement to the police. Similarly, contradicting the person can be done.

You Might Also Like

Section 400 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Order To Pay Costs In Non-Cognizable Cases.

Section 395 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Order To Pay Compensation.

Section 349 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Power Of Magistrate To Order Person To Give Specimen Signatures Or Handwriting, Etc.

Section 167 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Local Inquiry.

19 IPC – Indian Penal Code – Judge

TAGGED:2023Admissibility of EvidenceContradictionCriminal ProcedureCross-ExaminationFact FindingIndian Evidence ActJudicial InterpretationOmissionPolice StatementsRe-examinationSilenceWitness Testimony
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Supreme Court Clarifies Rules On Citizenship Resumption And Foreign Nationality Supreme Court Clarifies Rules On Citizenship Resumption And Foreign Nationality
Next Article Section 191 - Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) - Complainant And Witnesses Not To Be Required To Accompany Police Officer Section 191 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Complainant And Witnesses Not To Be Required To Accompany Police Officer And Not To Be Subject To Restraint.
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Bombay HC Grants Bail to Rape Accused; Questions Feasibility of Crime at Crowded Beach on Eid
High CourtNews

Bombay HC Grants Bail to Rape Accused; Questions Feasibility of Crime at Crowded Beach on Eid

Apni Law
By Apni Law
1 year ago
Terms Of The Contract Is Primary For The Arbitrator To Decide: Delhi High Court
Right To Speedy Trial Not Automatic For Bail: Delhi High Court Denies Relief To Gangster Neeraj Bawaniya
Discovery of Cash At Justice Yashwant Varma’s Official Residence: Supreme Court Has Publicised Videos and Photos
Recording and Circulating Court Proceedings via Video Conferencing is Prohibited: Kerala HC
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Prisoner Freed Despite Missing File By Calcutta High Court

Punishment and Legal Action Under Section 6 of Indecent Representation of Women Act

Media & Entertainment Law: Career Insights And Opportunities

What Content Is Banned and What’s Allowed Under the Indecent Representation of Women Act? (Sections 3, 4 and 5)

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?