By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Witness Statement Not Required To Take Cognizance By Magistrate, Says Punjab & Haryana High Court
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > High Court > Punjab & Haryana High Court > Witness Statement Not Required To Take Cognizance By Magistrate, Says Punjab & Haryana High Court
NewsPunjab & Haryana High Court

Witness Statement Not Required To Take Cognizance By Magistrate, Says Punjab & Haryana High Court

Amna Kabeer
Last updated: July 8, 2025 1:46 pm
Amna Kabeer
3 weeks ago
Share
How To Be A Witness Of A Marriage Registration
How To Be A Witness Of A Marriage Registration
SHARE

The Punjab & Haryana High Court has ruled that under Section 210(1)(c) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, a Magistrate is not required to record witness statements or summon the aggrieved party before taking cognizance or issuing process. Justice Sanjay Vashisth clarified that the Magistrate can act on personal knowledge or information from any person other than a police officer. The Court emphasized that cognizance depends solely on the Magistrate’s satisfaction and no specific procedure is needed before issuing process. In warrant cases, the Magistrate can summon the accused under Section 227(1)(b) BNSS for appearance. The Court also stated that Section 211 ensures the accused’s right to file objections, protecting against false accusations. These observations came while dismissing a plea by four police officials challenging their summoning in a custodial death case.

The Court found sufficient material was present before the Magistrate, including statements from witnesses and officials. It held that the accused approached the Court prematurely, and there was no violation of procedure. The Court concluded that the Magistrate’s action was lawful and within the scope of BNSS, 2023.

You Might Also Like

Justice Surya Kant Stresses Ethical Balance In AI and Smart Transportation At International Legal Conference In Kerala

Pressing Lips of a Minor May Outrage Modesty But Doesn’t Necessarily Constitute Aggravated Sexual Assault: Delhi HC

Section 225 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Postponement Of Issue Of Process.

Supreme Court Recognizes Right to Freedom from Adverse Effects of Climate Change in Landmark Decision

Supreme Court Declines Immediate Relief For Byjus In Insolvency Proceedings: CoC Formation Not Halted

TAGGED:Aggrieved PartyCognizable CasesCognizanceCognizance of OffensesMagistrate CognizancePunjab and Haryana High courtWitness Statements
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Right to Maintenance For Women Widowed Daughter-in-law Can Claim Maintenance from In-laws Under HAMA, Rules Jharkhand High Court
Next Article Supreme Court Clarifies: Overtaking Alone Doesn't Constitute Rash Or Negligent Driving Overspeeding and Rash Driving Penalties Under the MV Act (Section 184)
7 Comments
  • Pingback: CrPC Section 259: Court's Power to Convert Summons Cases ...
  • Pingback: CrPC Section 258: Power to Stop Proceedings in Specific Cases - ApniLaw
  • Pingback: Section 257 CrPC: Withdrawal of Complaint - Code of Criminal Procedure - ApniLaw
  • Pingback: Section 245 CrPC: Discharge of Accused - Code of Criminal Procedure - ApniLaw
  • Pingback: CrPC Section 229: Conviction on Plea of Guilty
  • Pingback: Section 228 CrPC: Framing of Charge - Code of Criminal Procedure - ApniLaw
  • Pingback: Overspeeding and Rash Driving Penalties Under the MV Act (Section 184) - ApniLaw

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
NDPS Act
High CourtNewsTelangana High Court

Co-accused Cannot be Convicted Based On Suspicion Or Assumption Without Proof: Telangana HC On NDPS Act

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
5 months ago
Supreme Court PIL Seeks Indian Army Deployment For Landslide Rescue On NH 66 In Karnataka
Easy Access to Clean Toilets a Fundamental Right : SC
Night time Arrest Restrictions for Women Are Not Mandatory: Madras High Court
Supreme Court Upholds Right to Bail for UAPA Accused Despite Delay in Trial: Shoma Sen Case
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Cheque Bounce - Negotiable Instruments Act 1881

Defenses Available In Cheque Bounce Cases: How An Accused Can Fight

Cheque Bounce - Negotiable Instruments Act 1881

Difference Between Civil Recovery and Criminal Action in Cheque Bounce Cases Under Negotiable Instruments Act

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?