By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Section 30 – Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) – Act Done In Good Faith For Benefit Of A Person Without Consent
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > Bare Act > BNS > Section 30 – Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) – Act Done In Good Faith For Benefit Of A Person Without Consent
BNS

Section 30 – Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) – Act Done In Good Faith For Benefit Of A Person Without Consent

Apni Law
Last updated: March 11, 2025 11:20 pm
Apni Law
5 months ago
Share
Section 30 - Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) - Act Done In Good Faith For Benefit Of A Person Without Consent
Section 30 - Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) - Act Done In Good Faith For Benefit Of A Person Without Consent
SHARE

Code: Section 30 BNS

Nothing is an offence by reason of any harm which it may cause to a person for
whose benefit it is done in good faith, even without that person’s consent, if the circumstances
are such that it is impossible for that person to signify consent, or if that person is incapable
of giving consent, and has no guardian or other person in lawful charge of him from whom it
is possible to obtain consent in time for the thing to be done with benefit:
Provided that this exception shall not extend to––
(a) the intentional causing of death, or the attempting to cause death;
(b) the doing of anything which the person doing it knows to be likely to cause
death, for any purpose other than the preventing of death or grievous hurt, or the
curing of any grievous disease or infirmity;
(c) the voluntary causing of hurt, or to the attempting to cause hurt, for any
purpose other than the preventing of death or hurt;
(d) the abetment of any offence, to the committing of which offence it would not
extend.
Illustrations.
(1) Z is thrown from his horse, and is insensible. A, a surgeon, finds that Z requires to be trepanned. A, not intending Z’s death, but in good faith, for Z’s benefit, performs the
trepan before Z recovers his power of judging for himself. A has committed no offence.
(2) Z is carried off by a tiger. A fires at the tiger knowing it to be likely that the shot may
kill Z, but not intending to kill Z, and in good faith intending Z’s benefit. A’s bullet gives Z a
mortal wound. A has committed no offence.
(3) A, a surgeon, sees a child suffer an accident which is likely to prove fatal unless an
operation be immediately performed. There is no time to apply to the child’s guardian. A
performs the operation in spite of the entreaties of the child, intending, in good faith, the
child’s benefit. A has committed no offence.
(4) A is in a house which is on fire, with Z, a child. People below hold out a blanket. A
drops the child from the house top, knowing it to be likely that the fall may kill the child, but
not intending to kill the child, and intending, in good faith, the child’s benefit. Here, even if
the child is killed by the fall, A has committed no offence.
Explanation.—Mere pecuniary benefit is not benefit within the meaning of
sections 26, 27 and this section.


Explanation of Section 30 BNS

Section 30 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 protects acts done in good faith for an individual’s benefit when:

Contents
Code: Section 30 BNSExplanation of Section 30 BNSIllustrations of Section 30 BNSCommon Questions & Answers on Section 30 BNSConclusion

🔹 The person cannot give consent due to unconsciousness, injury, or incapacity.
🔹 There is no legal guardian available to provide consent.
🔹 The act is necessary for survival or well-being.

Key Takeaways:
✅ Acts must be done with honest intentions to help the person.
✅ The law protects such acts from criminal liability.
✅ Exceptions apply to cases of intentional harm or death.

🔗 Related: Section 29 BNS – Exclusion of Certain Acts


Illustrations of Section 30 BNS

Example 1: Emergency Surgery Without Consent
A man falls unconscious after an accident. A surgeon performs life-saving surgery immediately, even though the patient cannot consent. Since the doctor acted in good faith, no offence is committed.

Example 2: Rescuing a Child from a Fire
A house catches fire, and a child is trapped inside. A person throws the child from the second floor onto a safety net, knowing the risk of injury but intending to save the child’s life. If the child is harmed, the rescuer is not criminally liable.

Example 3: Shooting at a Wild Animal
A tiger attacks a man in a forest. A hunter shoots the tiger, knowing there is a chance the bullet may hit the man. Even if the man dies accidentally, the hunter is not guilty because the act was in good faith to save the victim.

🔗 Read: Section 31 BNS – Acts Done in Good Faith for Public Benefit


Common Questions & Answers on Section 30 BNS

  1. Can this section protect doctors performing life-saving treatment without consent?
    ✅ Yes, if the treatment is urgent and in good faith, doctors cannot be held criminally liable.
  2. What if the person dies during an emergency procedure?
    ✅ If the intent was to save life and there was no negligence, there is no offence under Section 30.
  3. Does this apply to causing harm for financial benefit?
    🚫 No, pecuniary (financial) benefit is not covered under this section.
  4. What if a person harms someone thinking it’s for their benefit, but the person disagrees?
    🚫 The court will decide based on intention and necessity. If the act was not essential, it may not be protected.

🔗 Also Read: Section 32 BNS – Consent and Criminal Responsibility


Conclusion

Section 30 of the BNS, 2023 ensures that individuals who act in good faith for the benefit of another person—especially in emergencies—do not face criminal liability. However, it does not apply to intentional harm, causing death, or financial benefits.

📢 For more legal insights, visit ApniLaw! 🚀

You Might Also Like

Section 128 – Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) – Force.

Section 116 – Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) – Grievous Hurt.

Section 70 – Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) – Gang Rape.Section 70 – Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) – Gang Rape.Section 70 – Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) – Gang Rape.

Section 186 – Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) – Prohibition Of Fictitious Stamps.

Section 292 – Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) – Punishment For Public Nuisance In Cases Not Otherwise Provided For.

Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Section 420 - Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) - Appeal Against Conviction By High Court In Certain Cases Section 420 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) – Appeal Against Conviction By High Court In Certain Cases.
Next Article Allahabad High Court Accused Must Have Lived in Shared Household for Domestic Violence Case:Allahabad High Court
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Vulgar Chatting
Madhya Pradesh High CourtMarriage and DivorceNews

Vulgar Chatting with Other Men Amounts to Mental Cruelty: Madhya Pradesh HC

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
4 months ago
Gujarat High Court Rebukes Railways Over Lion Deaths from Train Hits
Violations Of Service Rules Do Not Qualify As Public Duty Under Article 226: MP High Court
Supreme Court Recognizes Right to Freedom from Adverse Effects of Climate Change in Landmark Decision
Justice Hima Kohli Advocates for Judicial Collaboration Between India & USA to Drive Economic Development
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

POCSO Act Save Children

Exceptions to the Ban: When Is Child Labour Legally Allowed Under the Child and Adolescent Labour Act?

Supreme Court Rules Slum Rehabilitation Schemes Are Not Real Estate Projects, Emphasises Public Purpose

Child Labour Rehabilitation and Welfare: Role of the Fund and Authorities Under The Child and Adolescent Labour Act

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?