By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Section 256 – Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) – Public Servant Framing Incorrect Record Or Writing With Intent To Save Person From Punishment Or Property From Forfeiture.
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > Bare Act > BNS > Section 256 – Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) – Public Servant Framing Incorrect Record Or Writing With Intent To Save Person From Punishment Or Property From Forfeiture.
BNS

Section 256 – Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) – Public Servant Framing Incorrect Record Or Writing With Intent To Save Person From Punishment Or Property From Forfeiture.

Apni Law
Last updated: April 2, 2025 11:17 pm
Apni Law
5 months ago
Share
Section 256 - Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) - Public Servant Framing Incorrect Record Or Writing With Intent To Save Person From Punishment Or Property From Forfeiture
Section 256 - Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) - Public Servant Framing Incorrect Record Or Writing With Intent To Save Person From Punishment Or Property From Forfeiture
SHARE

Code: Section 256 BNS

Offence: Falsification of Records by a Public Servant

Whoever, being a public servant, and being as such public servant, charged
with the preparation of any record or other writing, frames that record or writing in a
manner which he knows to be incorrect, with intent to cause, or knowing it to be likely that
he will thereby cause, loss or injury to the public or to any person, or with intent thereby
to save, or knowing it to be likely that he will thereby save, any person from legal
punishment, or with intent to save, or knowing that he is likely thereby to save, any
property from forfeiture or other charge to which it is liable by law, shall be punished with
imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine,
or with both.


Explanation of Section 256 BNS

Section 256 of the BNSS deals with the criminal act of falsifying records or documents by a public servant. This section aims to prevent corruption, fraud, and misconduct in the preparation of official records. Key elements include:

Contents
Code: Section 256 BNSOffence: Falsification of Records by a Public ServantExplanation of Section 256 BNSIllustrationExample 1: Falsifying Official RecordsExample 2: Saving a Person from Legal PunishmentCommon Questions and Answers on Section 256 BNS1. What constitutes an offence under Section 256 BNS?2. What is the punishment for framing incorrect records under Section 256?3. Does this section apply to all types of records?Conclusion
  • Public Servant: The offender must be a public servant who holds an official position requiring the preparation of records or documents.
  • Incorrect Records: The offence involves knowingly creating false records or documents, whether intentionally altering existing data or fabricating new information.
  • Intent or Knowledge: The act must be committed with:
    • The intent to cause loss or injury to the public or an individual.
    • The intent to save a person from legal punishment or reduce their liability.
    • The intent to prevent property from being forfeited or charged under the law.
  • Punishment:
    • Imprisonment for up to three years (either rigorous or simple imprisonment).
    • A fine, or both imprisonment and fine.

Illustration

Example 1: Falsifying Official Records

A government clerk intentionally alters financial records to hide embezzlement, knowing it will cause financial loss to the public. This act can lead to punishment under Section 256.

Example 2: Saving a Person from Legal Punishment

A police officer prepares a false investigation report to favor a person involved in a crime, intending to prevent the person from facing legal consequences. This constitutes an offence under this section.


Common Questions and Answers on Section 256 BNS

1. What constitutes an offence under Section 256 BNS?

  • Answer: It involves a public servant knowingly framing incorrect records or documents with the intent to cause harm to the public, save someone from legal punishment, or prevent property from being forfeited.

2. What is the punishment for framing incorrect records under Section 256?

  • Answer: The punishment can be imprisonment for up to three years, a fine, or both.

3. Does this section apply to all types of records?

  • Answer: Yes, it applies to all official records, documents, reports, or writings prepared by public servants in the course of their duties.

Conclusion

Section 256 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita underscores the importance of integrity and honesty in public administration. It aims to deter public servants from manipulating records for personal gain or to obstruct justice, thereby promoting transparency and accountability in governance.

You Might Also Like

Section 199 – Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) – Public Servant Disobeying Direction Under Law.

Section 355 – Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) – Misconduct In Public By A Drunken Person.

Section 77 – Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) – Voyeurism.

Section 246 – Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) – Dishonestly Making False Claim In Court.

Section 194 – Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) – Affray.

Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article How To File A Complaint On E- Daakhil? How To File A Human Rights Complaint In India
Next Article Legal Considerations For NRI Inter-Caste Marriages How to Address Issues Related to Marriages of Indian Women to NRI/PIOs
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
High Court of Rajasthan
High CourtNewsRajasthan High CourtWomen Rights

Compassionate Appointment Not Based On Marital Status Of Daughter: Rajasthan HC

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
5 months ago
Supreme Court Allows Sub-Classification Of Scheduled Castes For Targeted Quotas
Must Avoid Recording The Full Name and Address Of POCSO Victims: J&K High Court Orders Immediate Redaction of Rape Victim’s Name
18 Months of Marriage, Woman Demands BMW, High-End Flat. SC Said Earn Yourself, Should Not Beg
FIR Against UN Official Dismissed For Alleged COVID-19 Spread: P&H High Court
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Cheque Bounce - Negotiable Instruments Act 1881

Defenses Available In Cheque Bounce Cases: How An Accused Can Fight

Cheque Bounce - Negotiable Instruments Act 1881

Difference Between Civil Recovery and Criminal Action in Cheque Bounce Cases Under Negotiable Instruments Act

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?