By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Section 190 – Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) – Every Member Of Unlawful Assembly Guilty Of Offence Committed In Prosecution Of Common Object.
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > Bare Act > BNS > Section 190 – Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) – Every Member Of Unlawful Assembly Guilty Of Offence Committed In Prosecution Of Common Object.
BNS

Section 190 – Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) – Every Member Of Unlawful Assembly Guilty Of Offence Committed In Prosecution Of Common Object.

Apni Law
Last updated: March 28, 2025 1:08 am
Apni Law
5 months ago
Share
Section 190 - Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) - Every Member Of Unlawful Assembly Guilty Of Offence Committed In Prosecution Of Common Object
Section 190 - Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) - Every Member Of Unlawful Assembly Guilty Of Offence Committed In Prosecution Of Common Object
SHARE

Code : Section 190 BNS

If an offence is committed by any member of an unlawful assembly in prosecution
of the common object of that assembly, or such as the members of that assembly knew to be
likely to be committed in prosecution of that object, every person who, at the time of the
committing of that offence, is a member of the same assembly, is guilty of that offence.

Contents
Code : Section 190 BNSExplanationEssential ElementsPunishmentIllustrationCommon Questions & AnswersRelated Sections (Internal Links)Conclusion

Explanation

Section 190 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, makes every member of an unlawful assembly criminally liable for any offence committed:

  • In furtherance of the common object of the assembly, or
  • Which the members knew was likely to be committed

This provision is based on the principle of “vicarious liability” where the act of one is treated as the act of all, if done in pursuit of their common unlawful objective.

The purpose is to discourage people from being part of any such gathering.


Essential Elements

For Section 190 BNS to apply:

  1. There must be an unlawful assembly as defined under 👉 Section 189 BNS – Unlawful Assembly
  2. An offence must have been committed by any member of that assembly.
  3. The offence must be:
    • In prosecution of the common object, or
    • Such that members knew it was likely to be committed.

If these conditions are fulfilled, every member present at the time becomes guilty of that offence, even if they did not personally participate in it.

Punishment

The punishment will be the same as prescribed for the offence committed in prosecution of the common object.

For example:

  • If murder is committed → Punishment under 👉 Section 103 BNS – Punishment for Murder
  • If mischief is committed → Punishment under respective Mischief sections

There is no separate punishment prescribed under Section 190; rather, it imposes constructive liability.


Illustration

If an unlawful assembly of five persons gathers to forcibly occupy someone’s land and one member of the group commits murder during this act, all members of that assembly will be held guilty of murder under Section 190 if it is proved that:

  • Murder was committed in prosecution of their common object, or
  • They knew such an offence was likely to happen.

Common Questions & Answers

  1. Can a person be punished even if he did not physically commit the offence? ✅ Yes, if he was a member of the unlawful assembly at the time and the offence was committed in prosecution of the common object.
  2. Is prior knowledge enough to convict under Section 190? ✅ Yes, if the member knew that the offence was likely to be committed.
  3. What is the difference between Section 190 and criminal conspiracy? 👉 Section 190 applies to spontaneous assembly with a common object, while conspiracy requires prior agreement to commit an offence.

Related Sections (Internal Links)

  • 👉 Section 189 BNS – Unlawful Assembly
  • 👉 Section 191 BNS – Rioting
  • 👉 Section 106 BNS – Right Of Private Defence Against Unlawful Assembly

Conclusion

Section 190 BNS ensures that members of an unlawful assembly cannot escape liability by claiming that they did not personally commit the offence. If the offence was committed to fulfill their common objective, each member is equally responsible.

For detailed and structured legal information, visit 👉 ApniLaw.com


You Might Also Like

Section 352 – Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) – Intentional Insult With Intent To Provoke Breach Of Peace.

Section 96 – Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) – Procuration Of Child.

Section 341 – Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) – Making Or Possessing Counterfeit Seal, Etc., With Intent To Commit Forgery Punishable Under Section 338.

Section 9 – Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) – Limit Of Punishment Of Offence Made Up Of Several Offences.

Section 21 – Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) – Act Of A Child Above Seven And Under Twelve Years Of Age Of Immature Understanding.

Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Supreme Court of India Active Participation And Shared Intention Necessary For Conviction: Supreme Court Acquits Husband in Wife’s Murder Case
Next Article High Court of Karnataka Accused Cannot Be Forced to Seek Case Documents via RTI: Karnataka HC
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Child Adoption
Child CustodyFamilyHigh CourtKerala High CourtNews

Step-Parent Adoption Requires Biological Parent’s Consent: Kerala HC

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
5 months ago
Phone Tapping Violates Right to Privacy under Article 21 Without Legal Grounds: Madras HC
Verbal Abuse and Beating Alone Not Abetment of Suicide: Conviction Under Section 306 IPC Set Aside By Andhra Pradesh HC
Arbitral Award Is Void When Specific Dispute Alone Is Referred: Kerala HC
Banks Can Invoke SARFAESI If Not Party to Resolution Plan: Kerala High Court
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Cheque Bounce - Negotiable Instruments Act 1881

Defenses Available In Cheque Bounce Cases: How An Accused Can Fight

Cheque Bounce - Negotiable Instruments Act 1881

Difference Between Civil Recovery and Criminal Action in Cheque Bounce Cases Under Negotiable Instruments Act

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?