By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Guest Faculty Not a ‘Workman’ Under Industrial Disputes Act, Rules Calcutta High Court
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > High Court > Calcutta High Court > Guest Faculty Not a ‘Workman’ Under Industrial Disputes Act, Rules Calcutta High Court
ActsCalcutta High CourtNews

Guest Faculty Not a ‘Workman’ Under Industrial Disputes Act, Rules Calcutta High Court

Amna Kabeer
Last updated: June 28, 2025 7:04 pm
Amna Kabeer
6 hours ago
Share
Calcutta High Court Bar Association Boycotts Proceedings Over Lawyer's Assault By Police
Calcutta High Court Bar Association Boycotts Proceedings Over Lawyer's Assault By Police
SHARE

The Calcutta High Court ruled that a guest faculty member paid per session cannot claim the status of “workman” under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul) dismissed a writ petition filed by Hansraj Koley against an industrial tribunal’s award. Koley worked with UCO RSETI from 2011 and claimed he performed regular duties under supervision and received Rs. 5,500 as honorarium. He argued that his termination in 2012 was illegal and challenged it under the Act. However, UCO RSETI said Koley only served as guest faculty for specific sessions and was paid honorarium per session, not regular wages. They highlighted a 2014 settlement where Koley accepted Rs. 2,000 and agreed to apply for future roles properly. The court found that the March 2012 letter wasn’t an appointment letter but an invitation for training sessions. It held that Koley didn’t meet the definition of “workman” under Section 2(s) or receive “wages” under Section 2(rr) of the Act. The court concluded that there was no employer-employee relationship and upheld the tribunal’s decision, dismissing the petition.

You Might Also Like

Supreme Court Sets Precedent: Officer Must Record Reasons for Arrest/Search under NDPS Act

The Indian Citizenship Act, 1955

Is Your Statement to NDPS Officers Valid in Court? Section 67 Of NDPS Act Explained

Wife Must Physically Reside in Jurisdiction to File Divorce Petition: Punjab And Haryana HC

Can Social Media Platforms Be Held Liable For Harmful Content? Section 79 Explained

TAGGED:Calcutta High CourtEmployeeEmploymentEmployment RulesGuest FacultyIndustrial DisputeIndustryWorkman
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article POCSO Act Granted Interim Bail Under Humanitarian Grounds in POCSO Case: Delhi HC
Next Article High Court of Himachal Pradesh FIR Must Show Caste-Based Motive to Deny Anticipatory Bail Under SC/ST Act: Himachal Pradesh HC
1 Comment
  • Pingback: FIR Must Show Caste-Based Motive to Deny Anticipatory Bail Under SC/ST Act: Himachal Pradesh HC - ApniLaw

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
High Court of Karnataka
Karnataka High CourtNews

Fresh Complaint Permissible If Initial Cheque Bounce Case Filed Prematurely: Karnataka HC

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
5 days ago
Right to Voluntarily Close Business Under Article 19(1)(g): SC
Bail Conditions Cannot Mandate Maintenance Payment In Marital Disputes: Supreme Court
Justice BR Gavai Urges Serious Action On Climate Crisis At International Legal Conference In Kerala
Daughters Born Before 2004 Partition Cannot Claim Father’s Property: Karnataka High Court:
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

High Court of Kerala

Clarification on Proof of Wills: Section 68 is the Rule, Section 69 is the Exception, Says Kerala High Court

What If Spouse Denies Participation In Proceedings Of Restitution Of Conjugal Rights?

Human Rights Courts Under the Protection of Human Rights Act: Structure and Jurisdiction (Section 30)

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?