By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Necessity Of Proper Mechanism Under Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) Act, 1954: SC Stresses Importance of Drugs and Magic Remedies Act
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > News > Necessity Of Proper Mechanism Under Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) Act, 1954: SC Stresses Importance of Drugs and Magic Remedies Act
NewsSupreme Court

Necessity Of Proper Mechanism Under Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) Act, 1954: SC Stresses Importance of Drugs and Magic Remedies Act

Amna Kabeer
Last updated: February 25, 2025 5:42 pm
Amna Kabeer
4 months ago
Share
Supreme Court of India
Supreme Court of India
SHARE


The Supreme Court of India has emphasized the necessity of a proper mechanism under the Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) Act, 1954 to enable citizens to file complaints against misleading medical advertisements. A bench of Justices Abhay S Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan directed Senior Advocate Shadan Farasat, acting as Amicus Curiae, to submit a note on the Act’s implementation before the next hearing on March 7.
The Court underlined that the Act requires a proper enforcement system, including grievance redressal mechanisms such as dedicated complaint helplines. Justice Oka stressed that strict prosecution must follow violations, as the Act holds vital public importance.

Contents
States’ Compliance with Previous OrdersNext Steps


States’ Compliance with Previous Orders


The hearing also reviewed the compliance of states and union territories (UTs) with past Supreme Court directives regarding misleading medical ads. Earlier, the Court had ordered states/UTs to submit affidavits detailing actions taken since 2018 under the Drugs and Magic Remedies Act, the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, and the Consumer Protection Act.


Jharkhand: The state claimed no manufacturer applied for Rule 170 permissions, but the Court demanded clarification on whether any misleading ads were being published in the state. A better affidavit was ordered.


Karnataka: The state failed to prosecute 25 cases due to lack of details such as license numbers. The Court dismissed these as excuses and directed authorities to use their police and cyber cells to identify offenders.


Kerala: The Court found no need for additional directions, as the state was effectively implementing Rule 170.


Punjab & Madhya Pradesh: Their affidavits were recently submitted, and the Court will review them at the next hearing.


Pondicherry: Initially issued a non-compliance notice, the UT was later granted more time after its counsel appeared in court.


Andhra Pradesh: The Chief Secretary was summoned for failing to file compliance reports. Despite requests for leniency, the Court refused, stating that the state showed no sense of responsibility in meeting deadlines.


Next Steps


Comprehensive directions are expected on March 7. The Supreme Court is set to ensure stricter enforcement of the Drugs and Magic Remedies Act. States and UTs will need to prove compliance or face serious legal consequences.

You Might Also Like

Lapses Weakened The Prosecution’s Case: Supreme Court Acquits Death Row Convict

Justice BR Gavai Urges Serious Action On Climate Crisis At International Legal Conference In Kerala

Retired Kerala Judge Loses ₹90 Lakh In Share Trading Scam

Supreme Court Grants Bail To Ashish Mishra In Lakhimpur Kheri Violence Case

PMLA Court In Kolkata Dismisses ED’s Complaint Against Nalini Chidambaram In Saradha Chit Fund Scam

TAGGED:Court DecisionHigh Court DecisionsMechanismSupreme Court
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Section 240 - Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) - Giving False Information Respecting An Offence Committed Section 240 – Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) – Giving False Information Respecting An Offence Committed.
Next Article NDPS Act Co-accused Cannot be Convicted Based On Suspicion Or Assumption Without Proof: Telangana HC On NDPS Act
13 Comments
  • Pingback: Supreme Court Upholds Right To Challenge Orders Despite Compliance Under Threat - ApniLaw
  • Pingback: Calcutta High Court Rules Section 354A IPC Cannot Be Applied Against Women - ApniLaw
  • Pingback: Supreme Court Upholds Regularisation Of Daily Wage Worker By MP High Court - ApniLaw

Comments pagination

← Older Comments 1 2

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
DMRC Win: Supreme Court sets aside arbitral award in Favor of Anil Ambani firm in Delhi Airport Metro Case
NewsSupreme Court

DMRC Win: Supreme Court sets aside arbitral award in Favor of Anil Ambani firm in Delhi Airport Metro Case

Apni Law
By Apni Law
1 year ago
Muslim Woman Can Claim Damages From Bigamy Marriage, Rules Madras High Court
Punjab And Haryana High Court Criticises ED’s Interrogation Practices In Surender Panwar Case
Violations Of Service Rules Do Not Qualify As Public Duty Under Article 226: MP High Court
Muslim Divorced Woman Entitled to Maintenance Under Section 125 Cr.PC If Husband Never Made Provision For Livelihood During Iddat Period: Patna HC
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Live-in Relationships

Live-in Relationships Go Against “Settled Law in Indian Middle Class Society.”, Allahabad HC

Ensuring Gender Equality In India

Protection of Human Rights Act: Key Definitions and Purpose Explained (Section 2 & Preamble)

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?