By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: We Will Not Leave This Vacuum: Supreme Court Seeks Regulation Of Obscene Content On YouTube And Social Media
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > News > We Will Not Leave This Vacuum: Supreme Court Seeks Regulation Of Obscene Content On YouTube And Social Media
NewsSupreme Court

We Will Not Leave This Vacuum: Supreme Court Seeks Regulation Of Obscene Content On YouTube And Social Media

Amna Kabeer
Last updated: February 19, 2025 6:53 pm
Amna Kabeer
4 months ago
Share
Censorship And Regulation Of OTT Platforms In India
Censorship And Regulation Of OTT Platforms In India
SHARE

Supreme Court On India’s Got Latent: We Will Not Leave This Vacuum


New Delhi, February 18 – The Supreme Court has expressed its intent to regulate obscene content on YouTube and other social media platforms. The Court urged the Union Government to take action, emphasizing that it would step in if necessary.

Contents
Supreme Court On India’s Got Latent: We Will Not Leave This VacuumCourt Seeks Government’s StandBackgroundCall for Strict OversightRegulatory Debate Intensifies


Court Seeks Government’s Stand


A bench comprising Justice Surya Kant and Justice N Kotiswar Singh conveyed its concerns while hearing a petition by YouTuber Ranveer Allahabadia. The petition challenges FIRs filed against him for alleged obscenity. While granting Allahabadia interim protection from arrest, the Court criticized the language used in his content.
The judges asked Additional Solicitor General Aishwarya Bhati to relay their concerns to Attorney General R Venkataramani and Solicitor General Tushar Mehta. The Court stressed the need to address the “vacuum” in online content regulation.

Background

A controversy erupted after a short clip from the India’s Got Latent episode went viral and faced widespread criticism. Allahabadia later apologized publicly. The show’s creator, comedian Samay Raina, deleted all episodes from his channel.

Police filed FIRs in Guwahati, Mumbai, and Jaipur against Allahabadia and other YouTubers, including Ashish Chanchlani, Jaspreet Singh, and Apoorva Makhija, for promoting obscenity. Chanchlani has moved the Gauhati High Court for anticipatory bail.


Call for Strict Oversight


Justice Kant highlighted the growing misuse of digital platforms. “If the Government of India willingly acts, we will be happy. Otherwise, we will not leave this vacuum. The way YouTube channels are being misused is concerning,” he stated.
The Supreme Court has issued a notice to the Union Government, seeking its response. It has also directed the Attorney General and Solicitor General to be present at the next hearing.


Regulatory Debate Intensifies


The case has reignited discussions on digital content regulation in India. With the rise of independent content creators, concerns over offensive material have grown. The Court’s remarks signal a potential move towards stricter oversight of online platforms.
The matter is set for further hearing, where the government’s position on regulating digital content will be scrutinized.

You Might Also Like

Delay in Reporting POCSO Offence Not a Crime: Delhi HC

Offences and Penalties Under the Transgender Persons Act (Sections 18–19)

Husband’s Father Not Automatically Liable For Widow’s Maintenance Under Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act: Patna HC

Harassment Must Be Severe Enough With No Choice But To Take Their Own Life: Supreme Court

Step-Parent Adoption Requires Biological Parent’s Consent: Kerala HC

TAGGED:LanguageOffensive ContentOnlineSexual OffencesSupreme Courtwomen's rights
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article India's Got Latent Controversy Engaged In Sexually Explicit Discussions On The Show: Gauhati High Court Grants Interim Anticipatory Bail To YouTuber Ashish Chanchlani
Next Article Supreme Court of India Active Participation And Shared Intention Necessary For Conviction: Supreme Court Acquits Husband in Wife’s Murder Case
1 Comment
  • Pingback: Active Participation and Shared Intention Necessary For Conviction

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
High Court of Madras
High CourtMadras High CourtNews

Prisoners Have the Right to Essential Facilities: Madras High Court

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
5 months ago
Supreme Court Limits Sentencing For Attempted Murder To 10 Years If Life Imprisonment Is Not Imposed
Supreme Court Declines Patanjali Ayurved’s Apology, Warns Baba Ramdev of Perjury Proceedings in Contempt Case
Section 39 Of Insurance Act Does Not Override Personal Succession Laws: Karnataka High Court
Easy Access to Clean Toilets a Fundamental Right : SC
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

6-Week Deadline For States on Transgender Welfare Boards: Warns Supreme Court

What Is the Role of the National Council for Transgender Persons? (Section 16–17)

6-Week Deadline For States on Transgender Welfare Boards: Warns Supreme Court

Welfare Measures and Government Duties Under the Transgender Persons Act (Sections 11–13)

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?