Muslim Widow With No Child Entitled to One-Fourth Share of Husband’s Estate Under Mohammedan Law: SC

Introduction

In a landmark judgment delivered by the Supreme Court of India, it has been clarified that under Mohammedan law, a Muslim widow who leaves behind no children is legally entitled to one-fourth (¼th) of her deceased husband’s estate. This ruling rejects claims to a greater share based on informal agreements and reaffirms the primacy of Qur’anic fixed shares in Islamic inheritance.

The case in question involved Chand Khan, who died intestate (i.e. without a will) and childless. His widow, Zoharbee (the appellant), contended that as the primary heir, she should inherit ¾ (three-fourths) of the property. Meanwhile, Imam Khan’s heirs (the respondent, being the deceased’s brother) countered that a portion of the property had already been transferred under an agreement to sell executed by the deceased during his lifetime and that this portion should be excluded from the inheritance pool.

While the trial court accepted the respondent’s argument, the appellate courts both the lower appellate court and the Bombay High Court, rejected that view and held that the agreement to sell did not extinguish ownership. Aggrieved, the widow appealed to the Supreme Court.

What Did the Supreme Court Decide?

1. Agreement to Sell Does Not Transfer Title Automatically

The Court reaffirmed that per Section 54 of the Transfer of Property Act, an agreement to sell, by itself, does not convey title in immovable property. Thus, in the absence of a registered sale deed, legal ownership remains with the deceased until his death, and the property continues to remain part of the “matruka” (the estate left behind).
In the instant case, because no finalized sale deed was recorded, the disputed land remained within the inheritance estate.

2. Matruka and Distribution Principles under Mohammedan Law

The Court revisited classical Islamic inheritance doctrine, specifically, the concept of matruka, which comprises all movable and immovable assets a Muslim leaves behind at the time of death, after satisfying debts and valid bequests (limited to one-third). Only then is the remaining estate distributed according to the fixed shares prescribed by the Qur’an and traditional Islamic jurisprudence.

3. Widow’s Fixed Share Under Qur’an (Chapter IV, Verse 12)

Quoting authoritative treatises such as Mulla’s Principles of Mahomedan Law, the Court observed that, under Qur’an, Chapter IV, Verse 12, a widow’s share is:

• ¼ (one-fourth) if there are no children or descendants, and
• ⅛ (one-eighth) if the deceased leaves behind children or grandchildren.

Since Chand Khan had no children or lineal descendants, Zoharbee was entitled to one-fourth of the matruka. The balance would then devolve to other legal heirs, including the deceased’s brother.

4. Dismissal of the Claim for Three-Fourth Share

The Supreme Court accordingly rejected the widow’s plea for three-fourths of the estate, holding that her rights are limited to the fixed Qur’anic share. The Bench, comprising Justices Sanjay Karol and Prashant Kumar Mishra, underlined that Muslim inheritance is non-discretionary and strictly governed by prescribed shares, there is no room for equitable deviation.

Implications & Significance of the Judgment

1. Reaffirmation of Qur’anic Share Doctrine
   The judgment underscores that Islamic inheritance law is not negotiable or subject to arbitrary adjustment. Courts must strictly adhere to the Qur’anic shares, and no informal agreements or private understandings can override them.
2. Clarity on the Effect of Unregistered Agreements
   By holding that an agreement to sell without a registered deed cannot defeat inheritance rights, the Court protects heirs from technical dispossessions. This provides legal certainty in disputes involving attempted transfers of property during life.
3. Protection of Widow’s Rights
   The ruling strengthens the position of widows under Muslim personal law. Even without children, a widow cannot be excluded from inheritance by side agreements or machinations of other heirs.
4. Precedent for Future Cases in Muslim Succession
   This Supreme Court decision will serve as binding authority in future inheritance disputes under Mohammedan law, especially in cases involving childless widows or transfers effected prior to death.
5. Limited Scope for Will or Bequest
   While Bequests (wasiyyah) of up to one-third of the estate are permissible under Islamic law, they cannot diminish the fixed sharers’ entitlements. This judgment puts litigants on notice that Qur’anic heirs cannot be overridden by informal or extra-statutory arrangements.

For any specific query call at ‪+91 – 8569843472‬

Conclusion

In summary, the Supreme Court has decisively held that a Muslim widow with no child is legally entitled to one-fourth (¼th) of her deceased husband’s estate under Mohammedan law.
The judgment emphasizes the non-negotiable nature of Qur’anic fixed shares, reinforces protection against unregistered property transfers, and provides authoritative guidance for inheritance disputes in Muslim family law.