By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Third Party Insurance and Compensation: Understanding Section 147 of the MV Act
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > Acts > Third Party Insurance and Compensation: Understanding Section 147 of the MV Act
ActsMotor Accident & DrivingNews

Third Party Insurance and Compensation: Understanding Section 147 of the MV Act

Amna Kabeer
Last updated: July 4, 2025 8:48 pm
Amna Kabeer
15 hours ago
Share
How To File A Complaint With The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal?
How To File A Complaint With The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal?
SHARE


Introduction


The Motor Vehicles Act, originally enacted in 1988 and significantly amended in 2019, is the cornerstone legislation governing all aspects of road transport and motor vehicle usage in India. This law regulates the licensing of drivers and conductors, registration of motor vehicles, control of traffic, construction and maintenance of vehicles, and most importantly, motor vehicle insurance and liability. The primary objective of the Act is to ensure road safety, establish legal responsibilities, and protect the rights of victims involved in road accidents.

Contents
IntroductionWhat Are The Insurance Policy Requirements and Liability Limits under Motor Vehicle LawRecent CaseConclusion


Over the years, with the rapid increase in vehicular traffic and road accidents, the Act has evolved to address modern challenges. The 2019 amendment introduced stricter penalties for traffic violations, mandated technology-based enforcement systems, and reinforced third-party insurance norms. One of the key pillars of the Act is the requirement for all motor vehicles to be insured against third-party risks, ensuring that victims of accidents receive fair and timely compensation, even when the offending driver cannot pay.


What Are The Insurance Policy Requirements and Liability Limits under Motor Vehicle Law


To meet the legal requirements under the Motor Vehicles Act, every vehicle owner must ensure their insurance policy aligns with specific conditions. Firstly, the policy must come from an authorised insurer. It should cover the policyholder or any specified persons against liabilities related to death, bodily injury, or property damage caused by using a motor vehicle in a public place. This includes protection for passengers, owners of goods, or their authorised representatives, but excludes gratuitous passengers in goods vehicles.
Even if the injured person or damaged property wasn’t physically present in a public place, liability still applies if the accident’s cause occurred in a public space.

The Central Government, in consultation with the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDAI), will set the base premium and insurer liability for third-party insurance related to death or grievous injury.


An insurance policy is valid only if the insurer issues a certificate of insurance. This certificate must include all prescribed conditions and required particulars. Any insurance policy issued before the 2019 Amendment will continue under its original terms, unaffected by the changes in the new law.


If a cover note is not followed by an actual policy within the allowed period, the insurer must notify the registering authority within seven days. Lastly, the insurer must indemnify the individuals or groups covered under the policy for any liabilities it claims to insure.


Recent Case


In a recent landmark judgment dated May 5, 2025, the Supreme Court of India ruled in Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Smt. Honnamma & Ors. that an insurer cannot deny third-party compensation simply because a trailer attached to an insured tractor was not separately insured. The Court held that a tractor and its trailer must be treated as a single vehicle for liability purposes under the Motor Vehicles Act. The insurer was directed to pay ₹9.5 lakh as per the policy terms and was allowed to recover any excess amount from the vehicle owner.

The Court emphasized that the Act serves a social welfare purpose and technical exclusions cannot defeat the rights of accident victims. This ruling sets a strong precedent, ensuring that victims receive fair compensation promptly, even if insurers attempt to avoid liability on technical grounds. The decision reinforces the need for insurers and vehicle owners to honor third-party obligations under the law.


Conclusion


In conclusion, compliance with insurance policy requirements is vital under motor vehicle laws. It ensures financial protection for victims and accountability for vehicle owners. Vehicle owners must secure valid insurance and maintain all necessary documentation to stay legally protected.

You Might Also Like

Prohibition of E-Cigarettes Act: Key Definitions You Should Know (Section 2)

All About POSH Act, 2013

Supreme Court Dismisses Petition For Remission, Imposes ₹10,000 Fine For Suppression Of Facts

Wife Can Claim Maintenance Even If She Has a Temporary Job: Kerala HC

Timeline for Resolving Sexual Harassment Complaints: What Sections 9, 11, 13 of POSH Act Says

TAGGED:InsuranceMotor accidentMotor accident claimsMotor vehicleMotor Vehicles ActMV ActSection 147
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Supreme Court Clarifies: Overtaking Alone Doesn't Constitute Rash Or Negligent Driving Overspeeding and Rash Driving Penalties Under the MV Act (Section 184)
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
High Court of Kerala
Kerala High CourtLand Dispute & WillNews

Clarification on Proof of Wills: Section 68 is the Rule, Section 69 is the Exception, Says Kerala High Court

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
7 days ago
Arresting Accused Under New Charge After Granting Bail In Same FIR Violates Fundamental Rights: Jammu and Kashmir High Court
Co-accused Cannot be Convicted Based On Suspicion Or Assumption Without Proof: Telangana HC On NDPS Act
Supreme Court Directs Bar Association Election Disputes To Civil Courts, Keeps Legal Question Open
Abetment Of Suicide Requires Clear Evidence Of Instigation, Mere Conflicts Cannot Constitute Abetment: Punjab & Haryana HC
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

How To File A Complaint With The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal?

Third Party Insurance and Compensation: Understanding Section 147 of the MV Act

Supreme Court Clarifies: Overtaking Alone Doesn't Constitute Rash Or Negligent Driving

Overspeeding and Rash Driving Penalties Under the MV Act (Section 184)

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?