By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Supreme Court Grants Bail To Ashish Mishra In Lakhimpur Kheri Violence Case
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > News > Supreme Court Grants Bail To Ashish Mishra In Lakhimpur Kheri Violence Case
News

Supreme Court Grants Bail To Ashish Mishra In Lakhimpur Kheri Violence Case

Amna Kabeer
Last updated: December 17, 2024 8:28 pm
Amna Kabeer
11 months ago
Share
Supreme Court Grants Bail To Ashish Mishra In Lakhimpur Kheri Violence Case
Supreme Court Grants Bail To Ashish Mishra In Lakhimpur Kheri Violence Case
SHARE

New Delhi, July 22: The Supreme Court grants bail to Ashish Mishra, son of former Union Minister Ajay Mishra. This is in connection with the Lakhimpur Kheri violence case from October 2021. Mishra was allegedly involved in an incident. Vehicles from his convoy ran over farmers protesting against the farm laws. This resulted in the deaths of five people.

Previously, in January 2023, a Bench of Justices Surya Kant and JK Maheshwari granted Mishra interim bail for eight weeks. This was subsequently extended multiple times. The interim bail came with stringent conditions. It  includes a directive for Mishra to leave Uttar Pradesh within a week. Also, not to stay in either UP or Delhi. However, this condition was later modified to allow him to stay in Delhi.

In today’s order, the Bench of Justices Surya Kant and Ujjal Bhuyan made the interim bail permanent. Thus, permitting Mishra to reside in either Delhi or Lucknow, UP. Mishra was also instructed to comply with the other terms set forth in the 2023 order. He could visit the trial location only a day before the proceedings.

The Court had previously instructed the public prosecutor and local police. They were to ensure the presence of witnesses during Mishra’s trial. Thus, noting delays due to absent witnesses. In today’s hearing, the Court stressed the need to expedite the trial. This noted that only seven out of 117 witnesses had been examined over 19 months. The Court directed the trial court to prioritise the case and schedule it accordingly. 

During trial

“We direct the Trial Court to fix the schedule, keeping in view the other time-bound or urgent matters that are pending but prioritising the subject trial. The Public prosecutor shall inform the Trial Court of the witnesses (not less than 5) who shall be produced on the date fixed. The State shall ensure that all witnesses shall remain present,” the order stated.

Senior Advocate Siddhartha Dave, representing Mishra, argued that Mishra’s influence had diminished since his father was no longer an MP. However, Justice Kant countered, stating that influence is not solely dependent on holding a ministerial position.

Advocate Prashant Bhushan, representing the victims, pointed out the slow pace of the trial, which prompted the Court to stress the urgency of the case. Despite Dave’s request to relax Mishra’s bail conditions to look after his daughters, the Court maintained that Mishra must stay away from the trial location except for the day before the hearings.

After considering various suggestions, the Court decided that Mishra could stay in Lucknow, ensuring he remains distanced from the trial proceedings in Lakhimpur Kheri. 

Ashish Mishra’s involvement in the Lakhimpur Kheri violence has been under scrutiny since October 2021. Initially, the Allahabad High Court granted him bail in February 2022, but the Supreme Court overturned this decision in April 2022, citing improper considerations by the High Court. The Supreme Court remanded the case back to the High Court, which subsequently denied bail on July 26, 2022.

This latest Supreme Court order aims to balance Mishra’s bail with strict conditions to ensure the trial proceeds without undue influence or delay.

You Might Also Like

Mere Suspicion Of Extramarital Affair Does Not Fulfill Ground for Abetment Of Suicide: Delhi HC

Writ Petition Maintainable Against Private Banks for Unauthorized Freezing of Accounts: Allahabad HC

Section 2 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019: Key Definitions You Must Understand

Article 21 Includes Living Free From Mental Trauma: Jammu and Kashmir High Court Allows Termination of 28-Week Pregnancy of Sexual Assault Victim

Heinous Offences Include Abduction, Physical Assault and Forced Self-incrimination: MP High Court

Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Supreme Court Ruling: Vendor Cannot Re-Sell Property Pending Registration Supreme Court Ruling: Vendor Cannot Re-Sell Property Pending Registration
Next Article Meghalaya High Court Meghalaya High Court Upholds 20-Year Sentence In Aggravated Sexual Assault Case
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Supreme Court of India
News

Supreme Court Issues Notice To Union Government Over Blood Donation Guidelines For Gay Men

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
10 months ago
ED Argues Against Arvind Kejriwal’s Plea in Liquor Policy Case Before Delhi High Court
Supreme Court Directs Government To Resolve Pension Discrepancies For Regular Captains under OROP Scheme
Section 2 of Indecent Representation of Women Act: Key Definitions and Legal Meaning
Necessity Of Proper Mechanism Under Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) Act, 1954: SC Stresses Importance of Drugs and Magic Remedies Act
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Prisoner Freed Despite Missing File By Calcutta High Court

Punishment and Legal Action Under Section 6 of Indecent Representation of Women Act

Media & Entertainment Law: Career Insights And Opportunities

What Content Is Banned and What’s Allowed Under the Indecent Representation of Women Act? (Sections 3, 4 and 5)

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?