By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail To OAS Officer Bijay Ketan Sahoo In Money Laundering Case
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > News > Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail To OAS Officer Bijay Ketan Sahoo In Money Laundering Case
News

Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail To OAS Officer Bijay Ketan Sahoo In Money Laundering Case

Amna Kabeer
Last updated: April 3, 2025 7:08 pm
Amna Kabeer
10 months ago
Share
Money Laundering Case
Money Laundering Case
SHARE

The Supreme Court granted anticipatory bail to Odisha Administrative Service (OAS) Officer Bijay Ketan Sahoo. The Directorate of Enforcement (ED) accused him of money laundering in a disproportionate assets case.

A bench comprising Justice Abhay Oka and Justice Augustine George Masih affirmed an earlier order from June 24, 2024, which provided Sahoo with interim protection from arrest. The court’s decision was based on the precedent set in the case of Tarsem Lal v. Directorate of Enforcement. It established that the ED cannot arrest an accused under Section 19 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. Once the Special Court has taken cognizance of the complaint.

The court ruled that the decision in Tarsem Lal v. Directorate of Enforcement governs this case, making the interim order dated June 24, 2024, absolute.

Officer Bijay Ketan Sahoo had sought anticipatory bail in the money laundering case, which alleges that he possesses disproportionate assets worth Rs. 5 Crores. The investigation originated from an FIR against Sahoo, his wife Nalini Prusty (a State Financial Official), and several family members for holding assets disproportionate to their known sources of income.

The ED’s investigation under the PMLA led to summons for Sahoo to appear before the Special Court in Bhubaneswar. Authorities allege that Sahoo and his wife acquired multiple properties, including six plots and a three-story building in Bhubaneswar, under a relative’s name despite the relative having no independent income.

The Supreme Court had initially granted Sahoo interim protection following his counsel’s clarification that Sahoo had been cooperating with the investigation for three years without arrest. The anticipatory bail petition was filed only after a summons was issued by the PMLA Court.

What Is The Prevention of Money Laundering Act?

The Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) combats money laundering in India. It empowers authorities to seize illegal assets, investigate financial crimes, and prosecute offenders. The law ensures strict action against financial fraud.

You Might Also Like

Gujarat High Court Issues Notices To Times Of India and Indian Express Editors Over Misrepresentation Of Court Proceedings

Trial Court Cannot Review Its Final Orders: Jammu and Kashmir HC

CrPC Section 406: Supreme Court’s Power to Transfer Cases & Appeals

Delhi High Court Transfers Investigation Of Faizan’s Death To CBI

Supreme Court To Examine Alimony In Void Marriages, Seeks Resolution Of Conflicting Judgments

TAGGED:Anticipatory bailbailMoneyMoney Found on Accusedmoney launderingSupreme Court
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article CJI Chandrachud Calls For Inclusive Policies For Persons With Disabilities CJI Chandrachud Calls For Inclusive Policies For Persons With Disabilities
Next Article Supreme Court Questions Excessive Reservation Under 'Institutional Preference' Quota In AIIMS PG Admissions Supreme Court Questions Excessive Reservation Under ‘Institutional Preference’ Quota In AIIMS PG Admissions
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
High Court of Karnataka
High CourtKarnataka High CourtNews

Section 39 Of Insurance Act Does Not Override Personal Succession Laws: Karnataka High Court

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
3 months ago
Supreme Court Clarifies: Overtaking Alone Doesn’t Constitute Rash Or Negligent Driving
DNA Report Cannot Prove Absence of Consent in Rape Case: Delhi HC
Chief Justice Highlights Judicial Process Issues At Special Lok Adalat Event
Supreme Court To Hear Petition Against Demolition Of Mangolpuri Mosque On August 1
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Prisoner Freed Despite Missing File By Calcutta High Court

Punishment and Legal Action Under Section 6 of Indecent Representation of Women Act

Media & Entertainment Law: Career Insights And Opportunities

What Content Is Banned and What’s Allowed Under the Indecent Representation of Women Act? (Sections 3, 4 and 5)

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?