By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Should Convicted Politicians Be Allowed to Make Laws? : SC Questions
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > News > Should Convicted Politicians Be Allowed to Make Laws? : SC Questions
NewsSupreme Court

Should Convicted Politicians Be Allowed to Make Laws? : SC Questions

Apni Law
Last updated: February 11, 2025 4:23 pm
Apni Law
3 months ago
Share
Supreme Court of India
Supreme Court of India
SHARE

Core Issue

The Supreme Court has raised concerns over convicted individuals returning to Parliament and State Legislatures, calling it a potential conflict of interest. The Court questioned whether those found guilty of breaking the law should have the power to make laws again.

Contents
Core IssueCurrent Legal PositionWhy It Matters

Current Legal Position

As per Section 8 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, convicted politicians are barred from contesting elections only during their prison term and for six years after release. The government maintains that this restriction is enough, arguing that MPs and MLAs are guided by propriety and public interest rather than formal service conditions.

Why It Matters

This raises a pressing question: Should convicted politicians face a lifetime ban from elections? Stricter laws could strengthen political accountability and public trust in governance. The Supreme Court’s decision on this matter could shape the future of electoral reforms in India.

You Might Also Like

Silence of Minor Victim During Cross Examination Not Grounds for Acquittal Of Accused: SC

Virginity Test Violates Women’s Dignity Under Article 21: Chattisgarh HC

The Rise Of Cryptocurrency In India: Blockchain, Legal Frameworks, And Future Prospects

Supreme Court Questions Excessive Reservation Under ‘Institutional Preference’ Quota In AIIMS PG Admissions

Supreme Court Criticises Poor Conditions In Assam’s Detention Centers, Orders Fresh Review

TAGGED:convicted MPs MLAsconvicted politicianselection laws Indiaelectoral reformslifetime ban on politicianspolitical accountabilityRepresentation of the People ActSC rulingSupreme Court India
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Live-in Relationships The Challenges of Regulating Live-in Relationships in India
Next Article POCSO Act Save Children Watching ‘Child Sex Abuse’ Material a Criminal Offence : SC
1 Comment
  • Pingback: Lapses Weakened The Prosecution’s Case, SC acquits death row...

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
High Court of Rajasthan
High CourtMarriage and DivorceNewsRajasthan High Court

No Fundamental Right to Live-In Relationship With a Married Woman: Rajasthan High Court

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
2 months ago
No Death Penalty If Reform Potential Exists, Even in Multiple Murder Cases: Supreme Court
Supreme Court Extends Tenure Of Justice Gita Mittal Committee By Six Months
Second Wife Not Liable Under Section 494 IPC in Bigamy Case: Chhattisgarh High Court
Punjab And Haryana High Court Criticises ED’s Interrogation Practices In Surender Panwar Case
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.
login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?