By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Civil Court Decree Necessary for Name Change in Board Certificates: Allahabad High Court
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > High Court > Allahabad High Court > Civil Court Decree Necessary for Name Change in Board Certificates: Allahabad High Court
Allahabad High CourtCivilHigh CourtNews

Civil Court Decree Necessary for Name Change in Board Certificates: Allahabad High Court

Amna Kabeer
Last updated: February 23, 2025 7:44 pm
Amna Kabeer
4 months ago
Share
Allahabad High Court Clears Path For Suits In Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Eidgah Mosque Dispute
Allahabad High Court Clears Path For Suits In Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Eidgah Mosque Dispute
SHARE


The Allahabad High Court has ruled that a person seeking to change their name in board examination certificates must first obtain a decree from a Civil Court. The court held that simply updating Aadhaar and PAN cards is insufficient for the Board to approve a name change.
A bench comprising Chief Justice Arun Bhansali and Justice Kshitij Shailendra clarified that acquiring a new name is governed by Chapter VI of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. A person must obtain a civil court declaration that officially changes their name from the decree date. The ruling prevents an endless cycle of name changes based solely on updated identification documents.

Contents
Case BackgroundHigh Court’s OpinionKey Takeaways


Case Background


The case involved a petitioner named Shahnawaz, whose name appeared in all High School and Intermediate mark sheets. In 2020, after obtaining an Aadhaar and PAN card in the name of “Md. Sameer Rao” and publishing a gazette notification, he requested the Uttar Pradesh Board of High School and Intermediate Education to change his name in academic records.
The Board rejected the application under Regulation 7 of Chapter III of the U.P. Intermediate Education Act, 1921, which restricts name changes beyond three years from passing the examination. The petitioner challenged this in the High Court, where a Single Judge ruled in his favor, citing Article 21 of the Constitution, which guarantees the right to choose one’s name. The State Government appealed against this ruling.


High Court’s Opinion


The High Court noted that each name change request must be examined on a case-by-case basis. It observed that some name corrections are permissible under educational board regulations. Although, changes involving a newly acquired name require legal validation.
The court emphasized that a civil court decree is legally binding. Whereas, a gazette notification is merely a public announcement with no enforceable authority. Furthermore, the court cited Section 34 of the Specific Relief Act. This allows individuals to seek a legal declaration of their new name, and Section 41 of the Evidence Act, which supports the conclusive nature of court judgments regarding personal identity.


Key Takeaways


Name changes in board certificates require a Civil Court decree, not just updates to Aadhaar and PAN cards.
Gazette notifications do not carry the same legal authority as a court decree.
Single Judges lack jurisdiction to declare board regulations unconstitutional. Only a Division Bench can do so.
With this ruling, the Allahabad High Court has reinforced the legal framework surrounding name changes. Thus, ensuring that official records maintain consistency and legal validity.

You Might Also Like

Supreme Court Criticises Railways for Appointing Employees Based On Forged Documents

Supreme Court Enforces Stricter Conditions for Tree Felling In Public Projects, Cites Right To Healthy Environment

Calcutta High Court Rules Section 354A IPC Cannot Be Applied Against Women

Section 26 – Hindu Marriage Act – Custody Of Children.

Terms Of The Contract Is Primary For The Arbitrator To Decide: Delhi High Court

TAGGED:Allahabad High CourtDecreeExamination
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Rajasthan High Court Mosque Falls Under ‘Waqf’, Disputes to Be Heard by Waqf Tribunal: Rajasthan HC
Next Article Kerala HC Freezing Bank Account Under Section 102 CrPC During Investigation Into Offences Under Prevention of Corruption Act Legally Valid: Kerala HC
2 Comments
  • Pingback: Understanding the Process of Obtaining a Certificate of Birth and Death in India - ApniLaw
  • Pingback: How To File a RTI (Right to Information) Application - ApniLaw

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Delhi High Court
Delhi High CourtHigh CourtNews

Terms Of The Contract Is Primary For The Arbitrator To Decide: Delhi High Court

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
4 months ago
Wife Must Physically Reside in Jurisdiction to File Divorce Petition: Punjab And Haryana HC
Congress MLA Sukhpal Singh Khaira’s Bail Stands As Supreme Court Rejects ED’s Plea
Calcutta High Court Lifts Previous Ban On West Bengal CM Mamata Banerjee
Forcing Couples To Stay Together Amount To “Mental Cruelty”, Creates Fictional Bond By Law: Punjab And Haryana HC
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Prisoner Freed Despite Missing File By Calcutta High Court

Punishment and Legal Action Under Section 6 of Indecent Representation of Women Act

Media & Entertainment Law: Career Insights And Opportunities

What Content Is Banned and What’s Allowed Under the Indecent Representation of Women Act? (Sections 3, 4 and 5)

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?