By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Children May Seek Legal Recourse If Denied Admission: SC
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > High Court > Delhi High Court > Children May Seek Legal Recourse If Denied Admission: SC
Delhi High CourtHigh CourtNewsSupreme Court

Children May Seek Legal Recourse If Denied Admission: SC

Amna Kabeer
Last updated: February 18, 2025 5:43 pm
Amna Kabeer
5 months ago
Share
Supreme Court of India
Supreme Court of India
SHARE

The Supreme Court of India has disposed of a petition seeking school admissions for Rohingya refugee children in Delhi. The court directed that these children should first apply to the concerned government schools where they claim eligibility. If they face denial despite meeting the requirements, they can approach the Delhi High Court.
A bench comprising Justices Surya Kant and N Kotiswar Singh emphasized that the proper course of action is for the children to submit applications to government schools. The court stated that in case of refusal, legal intervention through the Delhi High Court would be an available option.

Contents
No Blanket Ban on AdmissionsCase BackgroundGovernment Policy ConsiderationsSupreme Court’s Final Order


No Blanket Ban on Admissions


During the hearing, the Supreme Court noted that there was no specific government circular prohibiting the admission of Rohingya refugee children into Delhi schools. Justice Kant highlighted that each applicant must apply, establish residency in the area, and follow due legal procedures. The ruling reinforces that eligibility-based admission remains a lawful process.


Case Background


The petition was filed by Social Jurist, a civil rights group, before the Delhi High Court. The NGO sought directions to the Delhi government and the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) to admit Myanmar-origin Rohingya refugee children into nearby schools. The petitioner argued that these children were denied admission due to the lack of Aadhaar cards.
Earlier this year, the Supreme Court had instructed the NGO to submit an affidavit detailing whether the Rohingya refugees resided in makeshift camps or regular residential areas. The affidavit later presented details of 18 children deemed eligible for school admission, with some of their siblings already studying in government schools in Delhi.


Government Policy Considerations


The Delhi High Court had previously ruled that as Rohingyas are foreigners without official legal entry into India, their education rights fall under government policy. The court directed the petitioner to take up the matter with the Union Ministry of Home Affairs for a policy-based resolution.
The High Court also noted that the issue has broader implications on security and citizenship. It emphasized that granting education to Rohingya refugees requires a policy decision from the government, rather than a judicial directive. The court remarked that no country allows courts to determine citizenship matters, reinforcing that such decisions fall within the domain of the executive branch.


Supreme Court’s Final Order


Dissatisfied with the High Court’s response, the petitioner had moved the Supreme Court. However, the Supreme Court upheld the lower court’s approach, directing the children to first apply for admission. The court clarified that if admissions are denied despite eligibility, the legal recourse remains open through the Delhi High Court.
This ruling leaves the matter in the hands of the government and local school authorities, reaffirming that education for Rohingya refugee children in Delhi will depend on individual applications and policy decisions.

You Might Also Like

Re-Testing Of Drugs in NDPS Cases Allowed Only in Rare Situations: Rajasthan HC

Supreme Court Clarifies Limits Of Promissory Estoppel And Legitimate Expectation In Light Of Legislative Changes

Supreme Court Upholds Auction Of Joint Property In Chandigarh Partition Dispute

Virginity Test Violates Women’s Dignity Under Article 21: Chattisgarh HC

Minor Girl Has Domain Over Her Body, Can Choose To Terminate Pregnancy: Madras HC

TAGGED:Children's RightsDelhi High CourtEducationJusticelegal recourseRight to Education
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Legal Guide To Selling Property In India As An NRI How To File A Case Under The Transfer Of Property Act?
Next Article High Court of Punjab & Haryana Conviction For Murder Amounts To Cruelty, Grants As Grounds For Divorce Under the Hindu Marriage Act: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Supreme Court of India
CriminalDocumentationNewsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: Magistrates Cannot Order FIR Under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. Without Justification

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
5 months ago
Bombay HC Grants Bail to Rape Accused; Questions Feasibility of Crime at Crowded Beach on Eid
Life Sentence Of Anu Shanthi In Attingal Double Murder Case Suspended By Supreme Court
Wife Entitled to Maintenance Despite Past Employment Due To Caregiving Responsibility: Delhi HC
Attempted Offence Under Section 377 IPC Is Punishable Under Section 511 IPC: Kerala HC
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Cheque Bounce - Negotiable Instruments Act 1881

Landmark Supreme Court Judgements In Cheque Bounce Cases (Case Overview)

Cheque Bounce - Negotiable Instruments Act 1881

Compounding Of Cheque Bounce Offence: Section 147 of the Negotiable Instrument Act

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?