By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Challenge A Threat To Secularism: Congress Defends Places Of Worship Act In Supreme Court
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > Civil > Challenge A Threat To Secularism: Congress Defends Places Of Worship Act In Supreme Court
CivilNewsSupreme Court

Challenge A Threat To Secularism: Congress Defends Places Of Worship Act In Supreme Court

Amna Kabeer
Last updated: January 23, 2025 5:35 pm
Amna Kabeer
5 months ago
Share
Challenge A Threat To Secularism: Congress Defends Places Of Worship Act In Supreme Court
Challenge A Threat To Secularism: Congress Defends Places Of Worship Act In Supreme Court
SHARE

The Indian National Congress (INC) has opposed the ongoing challenge to the Places of Worship Act, 1991 (PoWA) in the Supreme Court. The party called the challenge a “motivated attempt to undermine secularism” and emphasized that PoWA safeguards India’s communal harmony.

Contents
Congress Defends Places of Worship ActSupreme Court Halts Fresh Suits on Religious PlacesKey Stakeholders and Arguments


Congress Defends Places of Worship Act


In its plea, Congress highlighted that the Act reflects India’s secular ethos and was enacted based on the popular mandate during the 10th Lok Sabha. The party rejected claims that the Act violates Article 25 of the Constitution. They cited the Ayodhya verdict that deemed it integral to a secular state.
The INC clarified that PoWA applies to all religious communities equally and defines a “place of worship” as any religious structure as it stood on August 15, 1947. The plea also refuted arguments that the law encroaches on state jurisdiction, asserting that the Act falls under Parliament’s authority under List III of the Constitution.


Supreme Court Halts Fresh Suits on Religious Places


On December 12, a bench led by Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna halted new lawsuits and surveys against religious sites. It also barred interim or final orders in pending cases concerning places like Gyanvapi Mosque and Mathura Shahi Idgah.
The petitions challenge the Act, which preserves the status quo of religious structures from 1947. It prohibits legal actions seeking their conversion.


Key Stakeholders and Arguments


Intervention applications have been filed by groups like the Gyanvapi Mosque Committee, Mathura Shahi Idgah Committee, and political leaders. They argue the Act is crucial for communal harmony. The Union Government has yet to respond despite repeated extensions.

You Might Also Like

Partition Deed Admissible for Collateral Use Despite Being Unregistered: Rajasthan HC

Supreme Court Clarifies Limits Of Promissory Estoppel And Legitimate Expectation In Light Of Legislative Changes

Suicide Threats by Spouse Amount to Cruelty for Divorce: Bombay HC

Banks Can Invoke SARFAESI If Not Party to Resolution Plan: Kerala High Court

Supreme Court Rules Legal Heirs Not Liable for Partnership Firm’s Debts After Partner’s Death

TAGGED:SecularismSupreme Court
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Bail Conditions Cannot Mandate Maintenance Payment In Marital Disputes: Supreme Court Bail Conditions Cannot Mandate Maintenance Payment In Marital Disputes: Supreme Court
Next Article Supreme Court of India Secularism As Core of India’s Nationalism: Indian National Congress Appeals To Supreme Court
2 Comments
  • Pingback: Union Of India Rebuked By Supreme Court Over ED's Misleading ...
  • Pingback: Secularism As Core of India's Nationalism: INC Appeals to SC

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
POCSO Act Save Children
CriminalNewsSupreme Court

Watching ‘Child Sex Abuse’ Material a Criminal Offence : SC

Apni Law
By Apni Law
4 months ago
Accused Cannot Be Forced to Seek Case Documents via RTI: Karnataka HC
Adoptive Mothers Also Entitled to Maternity Leave: Chattisgarh HC
Step-Parent Adoption Requires Biological Parent’s Consent: Kerala HC
Recording and Circulating Court Proceedings via Video Conferencing is Prohibited: Kerala HC
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Prisoner Freed Despite Missing File By Calcutta High Court

Punishment and Legal Action Under Section 6 of Indecent Representation of Women Act

Media & Entertainment Law: Career Insights And Opportunities

What Content Is Banned and What’s Allowed Under the Indecent Representation of Women Act? (Sections 3, 4 and 5)

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?