By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Section 191 IPC: Giving False Evidence in India
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > Bare Act > IPC > Section 191 IPC: Giving False Evidence in India
IPC

Section 191 IPC: Giving False Evidence in India

Apni Law
Last updated: June 25, 2025 4:03 pm
Apni Law
1 year ago
Share
Indian Penal Code
Indian Penal Code
SHARE

Code:

Contents
Explanation:Illustration:Common Questions and Answers:What is the difference between giving false evidence and perjury?Can a person be charged under both Section 191 IPC and the perjury law?What are the consequences of being convicted under Section 191 IPC?

Whoever, being legally bound by an oath or by an express provision of law to state the truth, or being bound by law to make a declaration upon any subject, makes any statement which is false, and which he either knows or believes to be false or does not believe to be true, is said to give false evidence.



Explanation1.—A statement is within the meaning of this section, whether it is made verbally or otherwise.



Explanation 2.—A false statement as to the belief of the person attesting is within the meaning of this section, and a person may be guilty of giving false evidence by stating that he believes a thing which he does not believe, as well as by stating that he knows a thing which he does not know.



Illustrations



(a) A, in support of a just claim which B has against Z for one thousand rupees, falsely swears on a trial that he heard Z admit the justice of B’s claim. A has given false evidence.


(b) A, being bound by an oath to state the truth, states that he believes a certain signature to be the handwriting of Z, when he does not believe it to be the handwriting of Z. Here A states that which he knows to be false, and therefore gives false evidence.


(c) A, knowing the general character of Z’s handwriting, states that he believes a certain signature to be the handwriting of Z; A in good faith believing it to be so. Here A’s statement is merely as to his belief, and is true as to his belief, and therefore, although the signature may not be the handwriting of Z, A has not given false evidence.


(d) A, being bound by an oath to state the truth, states that he knows that Z was at a particular place on a particular day, not knowing anything upon the subject. A gives false evidence whether Z was at that place on the day named or not.
(e) A, an interpreter or translator, gives or certifies as a true interpretation or translation of a statement or document which he is bound by oath to interpret or translate truly, that which is not and which he does not believe to be a true interpretation or translation. A has given false evidence.

Explanation:

This section states that whoever, being legally bound to state the truth, gives false evidence in any judicial proceeding, or in any other proceeding where evidence is legally taken, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.

The essential elements of this offense are:

  • Legal Obligation to State the Truth: The accused must have been legally bound to state the truth, meaning they were under a legal duty to provide truthful testimony or evidence.
  • False Evidence: The accused must have given false evidence, meaning they knowingly and intentionally provided false information or concealed the truth.
  • Judicial Proceeding or Other Proceeding: The false evidence must have been given in a judicial proceeding, such as a trial, or in any other proceeding where evidence is legally taken, such as a departmental inquiry.

Illustration:

A witness in a murder trial is asked by the court whether he saw the accused at the scene of the crime. He knowingly gives false evidence by stating that he did not see the accused, even though he actually did. This would be considered a violation of Section 191 IPC.

Common Questions and Answers:

What is the difference between giving false evidence and perjury?

Perjury is a more specific offense that applies only to false statements made under oath in a judicial proceeding. Section 191 IPC is a broader offense that covers false evidence in any proceeding where evidence is legally taken.

Can a person be charged under both Section 191 IPC and the perjury law?

Yes, a person can be charged under both sections if the circumstances warrant it. However, they cannot be convicted of both offenses for the same act.

What are the consequences of being convicted under Section 191 IPC?

Conviction under this section carries a penalty of imprisonment up to seven years and a fine. It also has serious implications for the accused’s reputation and credibility.

You Might Also Like

Section 13 – Hindu Marriage Act – Divorce.

Section 350 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Expenses Of Complainants And Witnesses.

CrPC Section 357: Order to Pay Compensation – Understanding the Code of Criminal Procedure

CrPC Section 261: Summary Trial by Magistrate of the Second Class

Section 233 CrPC: Entering upon Defence – Code of Criminal Procedure

TAGGED:Court ProceedingsCriminal JusticeCriminal LawFalse EvidenceIndiaIndian Penal CodeLawLegallegal proceedingsPerjurySection 191Testimony
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Indirect Taxes In India: Types, Impact And The Evolution Of Goods And Service Tax Indirect Taxes In India: Types, Impact And The Evolution Of Goods And Service Tax
Next Article Indian Penal Code IPC Section 193: Punishment for False Evidence in India
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Supreme Court Orders Immediate Removal Of Social Media Content Identifying Raped And Murdered Trainee Doctor
News

Supreme Court Orders Immediate Removal Of Social Media Content Identifying Raped And Murdered Trainee Doctor

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
11 months ago
Eviction Only If Senior Citizen Owns Property Occupied By Their Children: Punjab And Haryana HC
Divorce Petition Within One Year Requires Separate Application Under Hindu Marriage Act: Orissa HC
Supreme Court Halts Contempt Proceedings Against DDA Vice Chairman, Seeks CJI’s Clarification
Secularism As Core of India’s Nationalism: Indian National Congress Appeals To Supreme Court
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Supreme Court Grants Bail to Humayun Merchant In Money Laundering Case

Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 Cannot Be Invoked Unless Clear Evidence Of Miscarriage Of Justice: J&K HC

Information Technology Act Of 2000: Key Provisions, Responsibilities, And Amendments

Section 67A of the Information Technology Act, Penalizes Publication of Sexually Explicit Material in Electronic Form

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?