By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: IPC 168: Public Servant Unlawfully Engaging in Trade – Indian Penal Code
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > Bare Act > IPC > IPC 168: Public Servant Unlawfully Engaging in Trade – Indian Penal Code
IPC

IPC 168: Public Servant Unlawfully Engaging in Trade – Indian Penal Code

Apni Law
Last updated: June 25, 2025 2:34 pm
Apni Law
1 year ago
Share
Indian Penal Code
Indian Penal Code
SHARE

Code

Whoever, being a public servant, and being legally bound as such public servant not to engage in trade, engages in trade, shall be punished with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to one year, or with fine, or with both.

Contents
CodeExplanationIllustrationCommon Questions and AnswersQ: What if a public servant engages in a small-scale business like selling vegetables from their home garden?Q: What are the exceptions to this rule?Q: What are the consequences of violating IPC 168?

Explanation

This section prohibits public servants from engaging in any trade or business without the explicit permission of the government. The objective of this law is to prevent potential conflicts of interest and to ensure that public servants prioritize their official duties over personal financial gains.

  • Public servant: This includes individuals holding government positions, such as civil servants, police officers, judges, and elected representatives.
  • Trade or business: This refers to any activity undertaken for profit, including commercial ventures, private enterprises, and professional practices.
  • Sanction of the Government: This means obtaining specific authorization from the relevant government authority to engage in the particular trade or business.

Illustration

Suppose a government official working in the department of agriculture secretly runs a private company selling agricultural fertilizers. This would be a violation of IPC 168, as the official is engaging in trade without government sanction.

Common Questions and Answers

Q: What if a public servant engages in a small-scale business like selling vegetables from their home garden?

A: This could still be considered a violation of IPC 168. The law does not specify the scale of the trade, and even a small-scale business might be seen as a conflict of interest.

Q: What are the exceptions to this rule?

A: Some exceptions exist. For example, a public servant may be allowed to engage in agricultural activities if it’s a small-scale operation and doesn’t interfere with their official duties. However, these exceptions are limited and require specific authorization from the government.

Q: What are the consequences of violating IPC 168?

A: A public servant found guilty of violating IPC 168 can face imprisonment for up to two years, a fine, or both.

You Might Also Like

Indian Penal Code Section 10: “Man” “Woman”

How To File A Case Under The Indian Penal Code (IPC)

Section 461 CrPC: Irregularities Vitiating Criminal Proceedings – Code of Criminal Procedure

Exhumation Of Gopan Swami’s Body To Proceed, Rules Kerala High Court

CrPC Section 60: Powers to Pursue and Re-take Escaped Prisoners

TAGGED:Conflict of InterestCorruptionCorruption LawCrimeGovernment OfficialIndian Penal CodeIPC 168LawLegalPublic ServantTrade
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Indian Penal Code IPC Section 165A: Bribery of Public Servants Under Prevention of Corruption Act 1988
Next Article Indian Penal Code IPC 171D: Personation at Elections in India
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
POCSO Act
CriminalDelhi High CourtHigh CourtNews

Consensual Love Among Teenagers Should Not Be Criminalized Under POCSO: Delhi HC

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
5 months ago
Supreme Court: Non-Mention Of Background In Termination Order Doesn’t Exempt It From Scrutiny
What Are The Legal Rights and Responsibilities of International Students in India
Murder Of Wrong Person Still Counts As Intent Under IPC 301: Supreme Court
Wife Entitled to Maintenance Despite Earning: Bombay High Court Clarifies Rule
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Supreme Court Grants Bail to Humayun Merchant In Money Laundering Case

Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 Cannot Be Invoked Unless Clear Evidence Of Miscarriage Of Justice: J&K HC

Information Technology Act Of 2000: Key Provisions, Responsibilities, And Amendments

Section 67A of the Information Technology Act, Penalizes Publication of Sexually Explicit Material in Electronic Form

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?