By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Section 316 CrPC: No Influence to Induce Disclosure – Code of Criminal Procedure
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > Bare Act > CrPC > Section 316 CrPC: No Influence to Induce Disclosure – Code of Criminal Procedure
CrPC

Section 316 CrPC: No Influence to Induce Disclosure – Code of Criminal Procedure

Apni Law
Last updated: May 30, 2024 9:30 pm
Apni Law
1 year ago
Share
SHARE

Section 316 CrPC: No Influence to Induce Disclosure

1. Code

Section 316 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) states that “No person shall be induced to make any disclosure or confession, or to answer any question, by any threat, inducement, or promise, or by any other means whatsoever.”

2. Explanation

This section guarantees the right of an accused person to remain silent and not be coerced into making a statement. It emphasizes the principle of free will and prohibits any form of pressure that could lead to false confessions or disclosures.

  • Threats: Using physical force, threats of violence, or harm to induce a confession.
  • Inducements: Offering material benefits, rewards, or favors in exchange for a statement.
  • Promises: Making promises of leniency, lighter punishment, or favorable treatment for cooperation.

3. Illustration

Suppose a police officer tells a suspect, “If you confess to the crime, I’ll make sure you get a lighter sentence.” This would be a clear violation of Section 316, as it constitutes a promise made to induce a confession.

4. Common Questions and Answers

Q: Can a confession obtained under duress be used as evidence?

A: No. A confession obtained through threats, inducements, or promises is considered involuntary and inadmissible in court.

Q: What happens if a police officer violates Section 316?

A: The confession obtained through coercion will likely be rejected by the court. The officer may also face disciplinary action or even criminal charges.

You Might Also Like

Section 7 CrPC: Territorial Divisions of India – Code of Criminal Procedure

CrPC Section 468: Limitation Period for Taking Cognizance of Offenses

Section 18 CrPC: Special Metropolitan Magistrates – Powers & Jurisdiction in India

CrPC Section 412: Reasons for Recording – Code of Criminal Procedure

Section 399 CrPC: Sessions Judge’s Revision Powers – Code of Criminal Procedure

Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Section 312 CrPC: Expenses of Complaints & Witnesses in India’s Criminal Procedure Code
Next Article Section 322 CrPC: Procedure When Magistrate Cannot Dispose of Case – India’s Code of Criminal Procedure
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Delhi High Court Orders Food Outlets to Cease Using 'Domino' Marks, Removes Them from Zomato and Swiggy
High CourtNews

Delhi High Court Orders Food Outlets to Cease Using ‘Domino’ Marks, Removes Them from Zomato and Swiggy

Apni Law
By Apni Law
1 year ago
Capital Punishment Needs To Be Rarest of Rare Case: Madhya Pradesh HC Replaces Death Penalty with 25-Year Imprisonment in POCSO Case
Rape on False Promise of Marriage’ Does Not Apply to Married Women: Kerala High Court
6-Week Deadline For States on Transgender Welfare Boards: Warns Supreme Court
Dowry Demand Not Necessary To Prove Cruelty Under Section 498A IPC: Supreme Court
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Secretly Recorded Calls Is An Admissible Evidence In Divorce Cases: SC

Accident Compensation Under the MV Act: What Victims and Families Should Know (Sections 166–168)

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?