By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Section 24 CrPC: Public Prosecutors in India’s Code of Criminal Procedure
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > Bare Act > CrPC > Section 24 CrPC: Public Prosecutors in India’s Code of Criminal Procedure
CrPC

Section 24 CrPC: Public Prosecutors in India’s Code of Criminal Procedure

Apni Law
Last updated: June 30, 2025 12:20 pm
Apni Law
1 year ago
Share
Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC)
Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC)
SHARE

Code:

Contents
Explanation:Illustration:Common Questions and Answers:Q: Who can be appointed as a Public Prosecutor?Q: Can a Public Prosecutor be removed from office?Q: What are the powers of a Public Prosecutor?

1[24. Public Prosecutors.— (1) For every High Court, the Central Government or the State Government shall, after consultation with the High Court, appoint a Public Prosecutor and may also appoint one or more Additional Public Prosecutors, for conducting in such Court, any prosecution, appeal or other proceeding on behalf of the Central Government or State Government, as the case may be.


(2) The Central Government may appoint one or more Public Prosecutors for the purpose of conducting any case or class of cases in any district or local area.


(3) For every district, the State Government shall appoint a Public Prosecutor and may also appoint one or more Additional Public Prosecutors for the district:



Provided that the Public Prosecutor or Additional Public Prosecutor appointed for one district may be appointed also to be a Public Prosecutor or an Additional Public Prosecutor, as the case may be, for another district.



(4) The District Magistrate shall, in consultation with the Sessions Judge, prepare a panel of names of persons, who are, in his opinion fit to be appointed as Public Prosecutors or Additional Public Prosecutors for the district.


(5) No person shall be appointed by the State Government as the Public Prosecutor or Additional Public Prosecutor for the district unless his name appears in the panel of names prepared by the District Magistrate under sub-section (4).


(6) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (5), where in a State there exists a regular Cadre of Prosecuting Officers, the State Government shall appoint a Public Prosecutor or an Additional Public Prosecutor only from among the persons constituting such Cadre:



Provided that where, in the opinion of the State Government, no suitable person is available in such Cadre for such appointment that Government may appoint a person as Public Prosecutor or Additional Public Prosecutor, as the case may be, from the panel of names prepared by the District Magistrate under sub-section (4).



2[Explanation.–For the purposes of this sub-section,–



(a) “regular Cadre of Prosecuting Officers” means a Cadre of Prosecuting Officers which includes therein the post of a Public Prosecutor, by whatever name called, and which provides for promotion of Assistant Public Prosecutors, by whatever name called, to that post;


(b) “Prosecuting Officer” means a person, by whatever name called, appointed to perform the functions of a Public Prosecutor, an Additional Public Prosecutor or an Assistant Public Prosecutor under this Code.]


(7) A person shall be eligible to be appointed as a Public Prosecutor or an Additional Public Prosecutor under sub-section (1) or sub-section (2) or sub-section (3) or sub-section (6), only if he has been in practice as an advocate for not less than seven years.


(8) The Central Government or the State Government may appoint, for the purposes of any case or class of cases, a person who has been in practice as an advocate for not less than ten years as a Special Public Prosecutor:



3[Provided that the Court may permit the victim to engage an advocate of his choice to assist the prosecution under this sub-section.]



(9) For the purposes of sub-section (7) and sub-section (8), the period during which a person has been in practice as a pleader, or has rendered (whether before or after the commencement of this Code) service as a Public Prosecutor or as an Additional Public Prosecutor or Assistant Public Prosecutor or other Prosecuting Officer, by whatever name called, shall be deemed to be the period during which such person has been in practice as an advocate.]




STATE AMENDMENTS




Karnataka–



Amendment of section 24.– In section 24 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Central Act 2 of 1974) (hereinafter referred to as the principal Act) in sub-section (1),–


(i) the words and punctuation mark “or the State Government shall”, shall be omitted; and


(ii) for the words “appoint a Public Prosecutor” the words “or the State Government shall appoint a Public Prosecutor” shall be substituted.



[Vide Karnataka Act 20 of 1982, s. 2.]



Maharashtra



Amendment of section 24.– In Section 24 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, (2 of 1974) in its application to the State of Maharashtra:–


(a) in sub-section (6), the proviso shall be deleted;


(b) after sub-section (6), the following sub-section shall be inserted, namely:–


“(6-A) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (6), the State Government may, subject to the provisions of sub-sections (4) and (5), appoint a person who has been in practice as an advocate for not less than seven years, as the Public Prosecutor or Additional Public Prosecutor for the district.”.


[Vide Maharashtra Act 33 of 2014, s. 2.]


Maharashtra


Amendment of Section 24 of Act II of 1974.–In section 24 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), in its application to the State of Maharashtra,–


(a) in sub-section (1), the words “, after consultation with the High Court,” shall be deleted;


(b) in sub-section (4), for the words “in consultation with the Sessions Judge,” the words “with the approval of the State Government,” shall be substituted.




[Vide Maharashtra Act 34 of 1981, s. 2]


Madhya Pradesh–



Amendment of Section 24.–In Section 24 of the principal Act.–



(i) in sub-section (6), for the words, “brackets and figure “Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (5)”, the words, brackets, letter and figures “Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (5), but subject to the provisions of sub-section (6-A)” shall be substituted and shall be deemed to have been substituted with effect from 18th December, 1978;



(ii) after sub-section (6), the following sub-section shall be inserted and shall be deemed to have been inserted with effect from 18th December, 1978, namely:–



“(6-A) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (6), the State Government may appoint a person who has been in practice as an advocate for not less than seven years as the Public Prosecutor or Additional Public Prosecutor for the district and it shall not be necessary to appoint the Public Prosecutor or Additional Public Prosecutor for the district from among the person constituting the Cadre of Prosecuting Officers in the State of Madhya Pradesh and the provisions of sub-sections (4) and (5) shall apply to the appointment of a Public Prosecutor Additional Public Prosecutor under this sub-section”;


(iii) in sub-section (7), after the words, bracket and figure “sub-section (6)”, the words, brackets, figure and letter “or sub-section (6-A)” shall be inserted and shall be deemed to have been inserted with effect from 18th December, 1978; and


(iv) in sub-section (9), for the words, brackets and figure, “sub-section (7)”, the words, brackets, figures and letter “sub-section (6-A) and sub-section (7)” shall be substituted and shall be deemed to have been substituted with effect from 18th December, 1978.



[Vide Madhya Pradesh Act 21 of 1995, s. 3.]



West Bengal–



In Sub-section (6) of section 24 of the principal Act, for the words “shall appoint a Public Prosecutor or an Additional Public Prosecutor only”, the words “may also appoint a Public Prosecutor or an Additional Public Prosecutor” shall be substituted.



[Vide West Bengal Act 26 of 1990, s. 3.]



West Bengal



In sub-section (6) of section 24 of the principal Act, the proviso shall be omitted.


[Vide West Bengal Act 25 of 1992, s. 3.]




STATE AMENDMENT




Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh (UTs).–



Section 24.– After sub-section (6), insert the following sub-section, namely:–


“(6A).-Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1) and sub-section (6), the Government of the Union territory of Jammu and Kashmir may appoint a person who has been in practice as an Advocate for not less than seven years as Public Prosecutor or Additional Public Prosecutor for High Court and for the District Courts and it shall not be necessary to appoint Public Prosecutor or Additional Public Prosecutor for the High Court in consultation with High Court and Public Prosecutor or Additional Public Prosecutor for the District Court from amongst the person constituting the cadre of Prosecution for the State of Jammu and Kashmir.”


[vide the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganization (Adaptation of Central Laws) Order, 2020, vide notification No. S.O. 1123(E), dated (18-3-2020) and vide Union Territory of Ladakh Reorganisation (Adaptation of Central Laws) Order, 2020, notification No. S.O.3774(E), dated (23-10-2020).]



Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh (UTs). —



Section 24.–In sub-section (7), for “sub-section (6)”, substitute “sub-section (6) or sub-section (6A)”


[Vide Order No. 3807(E) dated 26th October, 2020, the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation (Adaptation of Central Laws) Third Order, 2020 (w.e.f. 26-10-2020).]





Uttar Pradesh




In section 24 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ”


(a) in sub-section (1), after words “Public Prosecutor” the words “and one or more Additional Public Prosecutors” shall be inserted and be deemed always to have been inserted :


(b) after sub-section (6), the following sub-section shall be inserted and be deemed always to have been inserted, namely :–


“(7) For the purposes of sub-section (5) and (6), the period during which a person has been in practice as a pleader, or has rendered service as a Public Prosecutor, Additional Public Prosecutor or Assistant Public Prosecutor shall be deemed to be the period during which such person has been in practice as an advocate.”


[Vide Uttar Pradesh Act 33 of 1978, s. 2]


Uttar Pradesh


In section 24 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, hereinafter referred to as said Code :”


(a) in sub-section (1), the words “after consultation with the High Court,” shall be omitted;


(b) sub-section (4), (5) and (6) shall be omitted.


(c) in sub-section (7), the words “or sub-section (6)” shall be omitted.


[Vide Uttar Pradesh Act 18 of 1991, s. 2]


Bihar




2. Amendment of Section 24 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Act II of 1974) in its application to the State of Bihar.–For sub-section (6) of Section 24 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Act II of 1974) the following sub-section shall be substituted and shall always be deemed to have been substituted namely: —



“(6) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (5) wherein a State there exists a regular cadre of Prosecuting Officers, the State Government may also appoint a Public Prosecutor or an Additional Public Prosecutor from among the persons constituting such cadre.”




[Vide Bihar Act 16 of 1984, s. 2]


Explanation:

This section empowers the State Government to appoint Public Prosecutors for various courts and tribunals. The Public Prosecutor is responsible for representing the State in criminal proceedings. Their duties include:

  • Conducting prosecutions on behalf of the State.
  • Presenting evidence and arguments in court.
  • Advising the police and other authorities on legal matters related to criminal cases.
  • Representing the State in appeals and revisions.

Illustration:

Imagine a case where a person is accused of theft. The police investigate the case and file a charge sheet against the accused. The Public Prosecutor appointed by the State Government will then represent the State in the court proceedings against the accused. They will present evidence, argue the case, and seek the conviction of the accused if they believe the evidence supports the charges.

Common Questions and Answers:

Q: Who can be appointed as a Public Prosecutor?

A: A person qualified to practice as an advocate under the Advocates Act, 1961, can be appointed as a Public Prosecutor.

Q: Can a Public Prosecutor be removed from office?

A: Yes, the State Government can remove a Public Prosecutor from office for reasons such as misconduct or inefficiency.

Q: What are the powers of a Public Prosecutor?

A: Public Prosecutors have the power to conduct prosecutions, withdraw cases, and represent the State in appeals and revisions. They also have the power to issue legal notices and seek warrants.

You Might Also Like

Section 296 BNSS: Powers of the Court in Criminal Proceedings

CrPC Section 412: Reasons for Recording – Code of Criminal Procedure

Section 135 CrPC: Obey or Show Cause Order – Code of Criminal Procedure

New York Times vs OpenAI: Is India’s Legal System Prepared for AI Challenges?

Section 34 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Duty Of Officers Employed In Connection With Affairs Of A Village To Make Certain Report

TAGGED:Criminal JusticeCriminal ProcedureCrPCIndiaIndian LawLawLegalProsecutionPublic ProsecutorSection 24
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Supreme Court Tasks CAG to Probe Corruption Allegations Against Arunachal Pradesh Government from 2007-11 Supreme Court Tasks CAG to Probe Corruption Allegations Against Arunachal Pradesh Government from 2007-11
Next Article Supreme Court Recognizes Right to Freedom from Adverse Effects of Climate Change in Landmark Decision Supreme Court Recognizes Right to Freedom from Adverse Effects of Climate Change in Landmark Decision
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Supreme Court Removes PUC Certificate Requirement For Vehicle Insurance
News

Supreme Court Removes PUC Certificate Requirement For Vehicle Insurance

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
11 months ago
Supreme Court Seeks Clarification On Retrospective Application Of New Undertrial Law
Supreme Court Rules On Balancing Surety Requirements with Personal Liberty In Multiple Bail Cases
Husband’s Unexplained Relationship with Woman Is Cruelty: Punjab And Haryana HC
Forcing Students To Travel To Distant Exam Centres Violate Right to Education Under Article 21: Punjab And Haryana HC
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

High Court of Madras

Phone Tapping Violates Right to Privacy under Article 21 Without Legal Grounds: Madras HC

Bombay High Court Strikes Down Maharashtra's Exemption For Private Unaided Schools From RTE Quota

Rape Cases Cannot Be Dropped Over Compromise, Victims May Face Perjury Charges: Bombay HC

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?