By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Section 22 – The Specific Relief Act (SRA) – Power To Grant Relief For Possession, Partition, Refund Of Earnest Money, Etc.
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > Bare Act > The Specific Relief Act > Section 22 – The Specific Relief Act (SRA) – Power To Grant Relief For Possession, Partition, Refund Of Earnest Money, Etc.
The Specific Relief Act

Section 22 – The Specific Relief Act (SRA) – Power To Grant Relief For Possession, Partition, Refund Of Earnest Money, Etc.

Apni Law
Last updated: May 8, 2025 12:34 am
Apni Law
3 months ago
Share
Section 22 - The Specific Relief Act - Power To Grant Relief For Possession, Partition, Refund Of Earnest Money, Etc
Section 22 - The Specific Relief Act - Power To Grant Relief For Possession, Partition, Refund Of Earnest Money, Etc
SHARE

Code: Section 22 Specific Relief Act

22. Power to grant relief for possession, partition, refund of earnest money, etc.

(1) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908), any person suing for the specific performance of a contract for the transfer of immovable property may, in an appropriate case, ask for:

(a) Possession or partition and separate possession of the property in addition to such performance; or
(b) Any other relief to which he may be entitled, including the refund of any earnest money or deposit paid or made by him, in case his claim for specific performance is refused.

(2) No relief under clause (a) or clause (b) of sub-section (1) shall be granted by the court unless it has been specifically claimed. Provided that where the plaintiff has not claimed any such relief in the plaint, the court shall, at any stage of the proceeding, allow him to amend the plaint on such terms as may be just for including a claim for such relief.

(3) The power of the court to grant relief under clause (b) of sub-section (1) shall be without prejudice to its powers to award compensation under Section 21.


Explanation of Section 22 – The Specific Relief Act

Section 22 of the Specific Relief Act provides courts the power to grant additional reliefs in suits for the specific performance of a contract related to the transfer of immovable property. The provision allows plaintiffs to claim not just the specific performance of a contract but also other forms of relief such as possession, partition, and even the refund of earnest money if their claim for specific performance is denied.

Contents
Code: Section 22 Specific Relief ActExplanation of Section 22 – The Specific Relief ActKey Provisions:IllustrationExample 1: Claiming Possession in Addition to Specific PerformanceExample 2: Refund of Earnest Money When Specific Performance is RefusedExample 3: Seeking Partition of PropertyCommon Questions and Answers on Section 221. Can I claim possession of the property if I’m suing for specific performance?2. Can I claim a refund of earnest money if the specific performance is refused?3. Do I need to mention these reliefs in my initial plaint?4. Can I claim possession and compensation together?Conclusion

Key Provisions:

  1. Relief for Possession or Partition: In a suit for specific performance of a contract for immovable property, the plaintiff may request possession of the property or partition and separate possession, in addition to the specific performance of the contract.
  2. Other Reliefs (Including Earnest Money Refund): If specific performance is not granted, the plaintiff can claim any other relief, including a refund of earnest money or a deposit made under the contract.
  3. Claim Requirement: The plaintiff must specifically claim the reliefs listed in sub-sections (1) and (2) in the plaint. If not initially claimed, the court may allow the plaintiff to amend the plaint during the proceedings.
  4. No Prejudice to Compensation Claims: The power to grant reliefs under this section is without prejudice to the court’s power to award compensation under Section 21, ensuring that a claimant can seek compensation even if they are claiming possession or a refund.

Illustration

Example 1: Claiming Possession in Addition to Specific Performance

A buyer sues for specific performance of a contract to purchase land. In addition to asking for specific performance, the buyer may also seek possession of the land. If the buyer is successful in the suit, they could receive not only the performance of the contract but also actual possession of the property.

Example 2: Refund of Earnest Money When Specific Performance is Refused

A seller fails to transfer the property as per the agreement. The buyer sues for specific performance, but the court decides that specific performance cannot be granted. In such a case, the buyer can claim the refund of earnest money paid at the time of the contract, under clause (b) of sub-section (1).

Example 3: Seeking Partition of Property

In a case where multiple parties are involved, and a specific performance of a contract to divide a property is sought, the buyer may ask for partition and separate possession of the property, along with specific performance, if it is part of the agreement.


Common Questions and Answers on Section 22

1. Can I claim possession of the property if I’m suing for specific performance?

  • Answer: Yes, under Section 22(1)(a), you can claim possession or partition and separate possession of the property, in addition to specific performance.

2. Can I claim a refund of earnest money if the specific performance is refused?

  • Answer: Yes, under Section 22(1)(b), if your claim for specific performance is refused, you can ask for the refund of earnest money or any deposit made under the contract.

3. Do I need to mention these reliefs in my initial plaint?

  • Answer: Yes, the relief must be specifically claimed in your plaint. However, if you miss mentioning these reliefs initially, you can amend your plaint at any stage of the proceeding to include them.

4. Can I claim possession and compensation together?

  • Answer: Yes, Section 22(3) ensures that claiming possession does not affect your right to claim compensation under Section 21 for any breach of contract.

Conclusion

Section 22 of the Specific Relief Act provides valuable additional remedies for plaintiffs seeking specific performance of contracts for the transfer of immovable property. It allows claims for possession, partition, and the refund of earnest money when specific performance cannot be granted. The section also ensures flexibility for plaintiffs to amend their plaints and claim the reliefs they are entitled to, making it a comprehensive provision for those seeking justice in property-related disputes.


You Might Also Like

Section 14 – The Specific Relief Act (SRA) – Contracts Not Specifically Enforceable.

Section 12 – The Specific Relief Act (SRA) – Specific Performance Of Part Of Contract.

Section 35 – The Specific Relief Act (SRA) – Effect Of Declaration.

Section 20A – The Specific Relief Act (SRA) – Special Provisions For Contract Relating To Infrastructure Project.

Section 8 – The Specific Relief Act (SRA) – Liability Of Person In Possession, Not As Owner, To Deliver To Persons Entitled To Immediate Possession.

Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Settlement Agreements in Mutual Divorce; Here's All you Need to Know Separation Before Divorce Agreement Counts for Mutual Divorce: Allahabad HC
Next Article Digital Property Theft A Crime - IT Act Is Digital Property Theft A Crime: Section 66,66A,66B Of The IT Act
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
President House India
NewsOpinion & Analysis

Impeachment of the President of India – Procedure, Grounds & Constitutional Provisions

Apni Law
By Apni Law
3 months ago
Supreme Court Upholds High Court’s Decision Allowing Defendant To File Written Statement After 17-Year Delay
College Canteen Run By Educational Trust Must Register Under KVAT Act: Kerala HC
Supreme Court Grants Bail To Ashish Mishra In Lakhimpur Kheri Violence Case
Conviction Invalid If Suicide Attempt Occurred in Same Period: Kerala HC
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Cheque Bounce - Negotiable Instruments Act 1881

Defenses Available In Cheque Bounce Cases: How An Accused Can Fight

Cheque Bounce - Negotiable Instruments Act 1881

Difference Between Civil Recovery and Criminal Action in Cheque Bounce Cases Under Negotiable Instruments Act

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?