By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Section 18 – The Specific Relief Act (SRA) – Non-Enforcement Except With Variation.
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > Bare Act > The Specific Relief Act > Section 18 – The Specific Relief Act (SRA) – Non-Enforcement Except With Variation.
The Specific Relief Act

Section 18 – The Specific Relief Act (SRA) – Non-Enforcement Except With Variation.

Apni Law
Last updated: May 8, 2025 12:24 am
Apni Law
3 months ago
Share
Section 18 - The Specific Relief Act - Non-Enforcement Except With Variation
Section 18 - The Specific Relief Act - Non-Enforcement Except With Variation
SHARE

Code: Section 18 of The Specific Relief Act

18. Non-enforcement except with variation

Where a plaintiff seeks specific performance of a contract in writing, to which the defendant sets up a variation, the plaintiff cannot obtain the performance sought, except with the variation so set up, in the following cases:
(a) where, by fraud, mistake of fact, or misrepresentation, the written contract of which performance is sought is in its terms or effect different from what the parties agreed to, or does not contain all the terms agreed to between the parties on the basis of which the defendant entered into the contract;
(b) where the object of the parties was to produce a certain legal result which the contract as framed is not calculated to produce;
(c) where the parties have, subsequently to the execution of the contract, varied its terms.


Explanation of Section 18:

Section 18 of the Specific Relief Act lays down the conditions under which a plaintiff cannot obtain specific performance of a written contract, except when the contract is subject to certain variations or modifications. It specifically addresses situations where discrepancies arise between the contract as written and the true intent of the parties.

Contents
Code: Section 18 of The Specific Relief ActExplanation of Section 18:Key Provisions:Illustration:Example 1: Fraud or MisrepresentationExample 2: Legal Result Not AchievedExample 3: Subsequent VariationsCommon Questions and Answers on Section 18:1. Can I enforce a contract if it contains errors or misrepresentations?2. What happens if the contract does not achieve the desired legal result?3. If the contract terms were changed after signing, can I still enforce it?Conclusion:

Key Provisions:

  1. Fraud, Mistake, or Misrepresentation (Subsection (a)):
    If the written contract differs from the parties’ actual agreement due to fraud, mistake of fact, or misrepresentation, the plaintiff cannot seek performance of the contract unless the variation is allowed. For example, if one party was deceived into signing the contract under false pretenses, the contract may need to be modified to reflect the true agreement.
  2. Object of the Contract (Subsection (b)):
    If the objective of the contract is to produce a certain legal result that the contract, as framed, does not achieve, the plaintiff cannot enforce the contract unless it is varied to align with the intended result.
  3. Subsequent Variations (Subsection (c)):
    If the terms of the contract have been altered after its execution, the plaintiff cannot seek specific performance of the contract unless the variation is considered in the enforcement process.

Illustration:

Example 1: Fraud or Misrepresentation

Anna contracts with Mark to buy a house, but Mark knowingly misrepresents the house’s condition, and the written contract reflects terms that do not align with what was agreed upon due to Mark’s misrepresentation. In this case, Anna cannot enforce the contract as it stands; any performance sought must include the necessary variations to correct the misrepresentation.

Example 2: Legal Result Not Achieved

Tom and Jane enter into a contract for the sale of land, intending to transfer the title to a property that is free of encumbrances. However, the contract, as written, does not ensure this result. Tom cannot seek specific performance of the contract unless it is modified to include provisions that ensure the transfer of clear title.

Example 3: Subsequent Variations

Sarah and John sign a contract for the sale of a car. After the contract is signed, Sarah agrees to deliver the car with new tires, and this is reflected in a revised version of the contract. Sarah cannot seek specific performance unless the new terms are incorporated into the enforcement of the contract.


Common Questions and Answers on Section 18:

1. Can I enforce a contract if it contains errors or misrepresentations?

No, if the contract differs from the original agreement due to fraud, mistake, or misrepresentation, the contract may need to be modified before specific performance can be sought.

2. What happens if the contract does not achieve the desired legal result?

If the contract is not framed in a way to achieve the legal result that both parties intended, specific performance cannot be obtained unless the contract is varied to achieve the intended result.

3. If the contract terms were changed after signing, can I still enforce it?

Yes, but only if the changes or variations are incorporated into the enforcement of the contract. You cannot enforce the contract as it was originally signed if the terms have been subsequently altered.


Conclusion:

Section 18 of the Specific Relief Act provides a framework for when a plaintiff can or cannot seek specific performance of a contract in writing. It prevents the enforcement of contracts that are flawed due to fraud, mistake, or misrepresentation, and requires modifications to ensure that the true intentions of the parties are reflected. Additionally, it allows for the enforcement of contracts that have been subsequently varied, as long as those variations are acknowledged and included in the enforcement process.


You Might Also Like

Section 42 – The Specific Relief Act (SRA) – Injunction To Perform Negative Agreement.

Section 40 – The Specific Relief Act (SRA) – Damages In Lieu Of, Or In Addition To, Injunction.

Section 8 – The Specific Relief Act (SRA) – Liability Of Person In Possession, Not As Owner, To Deliver To Persons Entitled To Immediate Possession.

Section 19 – The Specific Relief Act – Relief Against Parties And Persons Claiming Under Them By Subsequent Title.

Section 29 – The Specific Relief Act (SRA) – Alternative Prayer For Rescission In Suit For Specific Performance.

Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Data Breach and Misuse - Cyber Crime - IT Act Will You Be Charged For Data Breach and Misuse: Section 72A Of The IT Act
Next Article Pre-Sentence Hearing of Criminal Understanding Pre-Sentence Hearings in India: Meaning, Purpose & Application
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Supreme Court of India
ActsNewsSupreme Court

Supreme Court Sets Precedent: Officer Must Record Reasons for Arrest/Search under NDPS Act

Apni Law
By Apni Law
1 year ago
Accusing Spouse of Adultery in Complaints Sent To Workplace Is Cruelty: Delhi HC
Supreme Court Seeks Government Response On AYUSH Drug Approval Rules Amid Patanjali Misleading Ads Case
Supreme Court Issues Notice To Union Government Over Blood Donation Guidelines For Gay Men
Proving Presence Of Matrimonial Disputes Not Enough to Hold Accused Guilty: Madras High Court
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Cheque Bounce - Negotiable Instruments Act 1881

Defenses Available In Cheque Bounce Cases: How An Accused Can Fight

Cheque Bounce - Negotiable Instruments Act 1881

Difference Between Civil Recovery and Criminal Action in Cheque Bounce Cases Under Negotiable Instruments Act

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?