By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Section 16 – The Specific Relief Act (SRA) – Personal Bars To Relief.
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > Bare Act > The Specific Relief Act > Section 16 – The Specific Relief Act (SRA) – Personal Bars To Relief.
The Specific Relief Act

Section 16 – The Specific Relief Act (SRA) – Personal Bars To Relief.

Apni Law
Last updated: May 8, 2025 12:23 am
Apni Law
1 month ago
Share
Section 16 - The Specific Relief Act - Personal Bars To Relief
Section 16 - The Specific Relief Act - Personal Bars To Relief
SHARE

Code: Section 16 of The Specific Relief Act

16. Personal bars to relief
Specific performance of a contract cannot be enforced in favor of a person:

(a) who has obtained substituted performance of the contract under section 20;

(b) who has become incapable of performing, violates any essential term of the contract that remains to be performed on their part, acts in fraud of the contract, or wilfully acts at variance with, or in subversion of, the relation intended to be established by the contract; or

(c) who fails to prove that they have performed or have always been ready and willing to perform the essential terms of the contract, other than those whose performance has been prevented or waived by the defendant.

Explanation:
For the purposes of clause (c):
(i) If the contract involves the payment of money, it is not necessary for the plaintiff to actually tender money or deposit it in court, unless directed by the court.
(ii) The plaintiff must prove performance of, or readiness and willingness to perform, the contract according to its true construction.


Explanation of Section 16:

Section 16 of the Specific Relief Act sets out the personal bars to relief for specific performance of a contract. It outlines the circumstances under which a person cannot seek the legal remedy of specific performance. This section emphasizes that only those who have met certain conditions are entitled to enforce a contract through this remedy.

Contents
Code: Section 16 of The Specific Relief ActExplanation of Section 16:Key Provisions:Illustration:Example 1: Substituted PerformanceExample 2: Failure to PerformExample 3: Fraudulent ConductCommon Questions and Answers on Section 16:1. Can I still seek specific performance if I have already received performance from another party?2. What if I become unable to perform my part of the contract?3. Do I have to actually pay money to prove I’m ready to perform?4. Can fraudulent behavior affect my claim for specific performance?Conclusion:

Key Provisions:

  • Substituted Performance: A person who has received substituted performance under Section 20 cannot seek specific performance.
  • Inability or Breach: A party who becomes incapable of performing the contract, or who violates essential terms, is barred from claiming specific performance. This includes situations where the party acts fraudulently or in a manner that disrupts the intended relationship of the contract.
  • Failure to Perform or Prove Willingness: If a party fails to prove that they have performed or were always ready and willing to perform their obligations, they cannot claim specific performance. The burden of proving performance or readiness falls on the party seeking specific performance.

Illustration:

Example 1: Substituted Performance

John enters into a contract with Sarah to supply goods. Sarah hires a third party to supply the goods instead of John. Since John has obtained substituted performance (the goods were supplied by another party), he cannot seek specific performance to enforce the original contract.

Example 2: Failure to Perform

Alice and Bob enter into a contract where Alice is to provide services to Bob. Alice fails to provide the services as agreed, and when Bob seeks to enforce the contract, Alice cannot claim specific performance because she has not proven that she was ready and willing to perform her obligations.

Example 3: Fraudulent Conduct

David and Emily enter into a contract where David is to sell property to Emily. However, David intentionally misrepresents the condition of the property to Emily, which results in fraud. David is then barred from seeking specific performance due to his fraudulent actions, even though Emily is willing to perform her part of the contract.


Common Questions and Answers on Section 16:

1. Can I still seek specific performance if I have already received performance from another party?

No, if you have obtained substituted performance under Section 20, you cannot claim specific performance.

2. What if I become unable to perform my part of the contract?

If you become incapable of performing your part of the contract, or if you breach any essential terms, you will be barred from claiming specific performance.

3. Do I have to actually pay money to prove I’m ready to perform?

No, if the contract involves the payment of money, you do not need to tender money or deposit it unless directed by the court. You just need to prove your readiness and willingness to perform.

4. Can fraudulent behavior affect my claim for specific performance?

Yes, if you act fraudulently or in a manner that disrupts the intended relationship of the contract, you will be barred from seeking specific performance.


Conclusion:

Section 16 of the Specific Relief Act provides critical limitations on who may claim specific performance of a contract. It ensures that only those who have acted in good faith, performed their obligations, or demonstrated willingness to perform may seek this legal remedy. Those who have violated contract terms or acted fraudulently are prevented from using specific performance to enforce the contract.


You Might Also Like

Section 14 – The Specific Relief Act (SRA) – Contracts Not Specifically Enforceable.

Section 18 – The Specific Relief Act (SRA) – Non-Enforcement Except With Variation.

Section 22 – The Specific Relief Act (SRA) – Power To Grant Relief For Possession, Partition, Refund Of Earnest Money, Etc.

Section 20A – The Specific Relief Act (SRA) – Special Provisions For Contract Relating To Infrastructure Project.

Section 8 – The Specific Relief Act (SRA) – Liability Of Person In Possession, Not As Owner, To Deliver To Persons Entitled To Immediate Possession.

Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Data Breach and Misuse - Cyber Crime - IT Act Will You Be Charged For Data Breach and Misuse: Section 72A Of The IT Act
Next Article Pre-Sentence Hearing of Criminal Understanding Pre-Sentence Hearings in India: Meaning, Purpose & Application
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Supreme Court Notifies Plea Challenging Kerala HC's Ruling on Muslim Woman's Right to Divorce via 'Khula'
CriminalFamilyHigh CourtKerala High CourtMarriage and DivorceNews

Non-Bailable Warrants Barred In Maintenance Cases Under Section 125 CrPC: Kerala High Court

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
4 months ago
Motor Accident Claims / Compensation Can’t Be Reduced Merely Because Dependents Took Over Business Of Deceased : Supreme Court
Supreme Court Imposes Fine On Gujarat Police Officer For Contempt, Accepts Magistrate’s Apology
Supreme Court Declares Royalty Under MMDR Act Is Not A Tax
Tax Dept Cannot Indefinitely Attach Properties Without Action For Resolvement: Delhi HC
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Prisoner Freed Despite Missing File By Calcutta High Court

Punishment and Legal Action Under Section 6 of Indecent Representation of Women Act

Media & Entertainment Law: Career Insights And Opportunities

What Content Is Banned and What’s Allowed Under the Indecent Representation of Women Act? (Sections 3, 4 and 5)

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?