By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Section 66 – The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act – Adoption Of Children Residing In Institutions Not Registered As Adoption Agencies.
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > Bare Act > Juvenile Justice Act > Section 66 – The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act – Adoption Of Children Residing In Institutions Not Registered As Adoption Agencies.
Juvenile Justice Act

Section 66 – The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act – Adoption Of Children Residing In Institutions Not Registered As Adoption Agencies.

Apni Law
Last updated: May 15, 2025 8:04 pm
Apni Law
2 months ago
Share
Section 66 - The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act - Adoption Of Children Residing In Institutions Not Registered As Adoption Agencies
Section 66 - The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act - Adoption Of Children Residing In Institutions Not Registered As Adoption Agencies
SHARE

Code: Section 66 JJ Act

(1) All the institutions registered under this Act, which may not have been recognised as Specialised Adoption Agencies, shall also ensure that all orphan or abandoned or surrendered children under their care are reported, produced and declared legally free for adoption, by the Committee as per the provisions of section 38.

(2) All institutions referred to in sub-section (1) shall develop formal linkages with nearby Specialised Adoption Agency and shall furnish details of the children declared legally free for adoption to that Specialised Adoption Agency along with all relevant records in the manner as may be prescribed, for the placement of such children in adoption.

(3) If any such institution contravenes the provisions of sub-section (1) or sub-section (2), it shall be liable to fine of fifty thousand rupees for each instance to be imposed by the registering authority and it may also attract de-recognition in the event of persistent flouting of such provisions.


Explanation of Section 66 JJ Act

Section 66 addresses the responsibility of child care institutions (CCIs) that are registered under the Juvenile Justice Act but are not recognised as Specialised Adoption Agencies (SAAs). These institutions still have legal duties when it comes to handling cases of orphaned, abandoned, or surrendered children in their care.

Contents
Code: Section 66 JJ ActExplanation of Section 66 JJ ActKey Takeaways:IllustrationExample 1: Linkage with SAAsExample 2: Penalty for Non-ComplianceCommon Questions and Answers on Section 66 JJ ActConclusion

Key Takeaways:

  • Institutions that are not SAAs must still report and produce children before the Child Welfare Committee (CWC) to declare them legally free for adoption as per Section 38.
  • Such institutions must build a formal working relationship with a nearby SAA.
  • After a child is declared legally free, the institution must share all records with the SAA to proceed with the adoption.
  • Failure to comply results in a fine of ₹50,000 for each instance. Repeated violations may lead to the institution being de-recognised by the registering authority.

This section ensures that no eligible child is left out of the adoption system just because of the administrative status of the institution in which they reside.


Illustration

Example 1: Linkage with SAAs

A registered shelter home houses three orphaned children. It is not recognised as an SAA. Under Section 66, the shelter must present the children before the CWC for adoption clearance and then coordinate with a nearby SAA to manage the adoption process.

Example 2: Penalty for Non-Compliance

A non-SAA institution refuses to report children eligible for adoption. Upon inspection, authorities find that no steps were taken to declare the children legally free or link with an SAA. The registering authority imposes a fine of ₹50,000 per child and warns of de-recognition if violations continue.


Common Questions and Answers on Section 66 JJ Act

  1. Do non-SAA institutions have adoption-related responsibilities?
    Yes. Even if an institution is not an SAA, it must report eligible children for adoption and coordinate with a recognised SAA.
  2. What is the process for adoption through a non-SAA institution?
    The child must be declared legally free by the CWC. Then, the institution must hand over the case to a nearby SAA for adoption placement.
  3. What happens if the institution does not comply?
    It will face a fine of ₹50,000 for each case. Repeated non-compliance can lead to the cancellation of its registration.
  4. Why is coordination with SAAs important?
    SAAs have the expertise and recognition required to place children in legal, ethical, and successful adoptions.
  5. How does this help orphaned children?
    It ensures every eligible child, regardless of the institution’s status, has a fair chance of being adopted and raised in a family environment.

Conclusion

Section 66 closes a critical gap in the adoption framework by holding all registered child care institutions accountable—even if they are not recognised SAAs. It mandates that no eligible child is left behind due to administrative or logistical hurdles. This provision strengthens India’s child welfare ecosystem by improving inter-agency collaboration and ensuring timely adoption placements.

For more legal resources and child protection updates, visit ApniLaw.


You Might Also Like

Section 105 – The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act – Juvenile Justice Fund.

Section 60 – The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act – Procedure For Inter-Country Relative Adoption.

Section 94 – The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act – Presumption And Determination Of Age.

Section 36 – The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act – Inquiry.

Section 88 – The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act – Alternative Punishment.

Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Narcotics & Drugs Re-Testing Of Drugs in NDPS Cases Allowed Only in Rare Situations: Rajasthan HC
Next Article Centre Defends Marital Rape Exception, Claims Alternative Remedies Exist for Protecting Women Marital Rape Not Yet Recognized Under Indian law: Madhya Pradesh HC
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
POCSO Act Save Children
CriminalFamilyHigh CourtJammu & Kashmir High CourtNewsWomen Rights

Must Avoid Recording The Full Name and Address Of POCSO Victims: J&K High Court Orders Immediate Redaction of Rape Victim’s Name

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
4 months ago
Children’s Court Must Conduct Inquiry Even If Juvenile Justice Board Orders Trial as Adult: Kerala HC
Grabbing Breasts And Dragging Amount To Aggravated Sexual Assault And Not Attempted Rape: Allahabad HC
Government Considers Legislative Action for Public Access To General Power Of Attorney Documents
Supreme Court Expresses Concern Over ‘Inhuman Working Hours’ Of Resident Doctors During RG Kar Hospital Case Hearing
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

High Court of Bombay

Mere Loan Recovery not Amount to Abetment to Suicide: Bombay HC

Supreme Court Urges Madhya Pradesh High Court To Reconsider Termination Of Female Judges

Capital Punishment Needs To Be Rarest of Rare Case: Madhya Pradesh HC Replaces Death Penalty with 25-Year Imprisonment in POCSO Case

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?