By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Section 42 – Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) – Opinion As To Existence Of General Custom Or Right, When Relevant.
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > Bare Act > BSA > Section 42 – Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) – Opinion As To Existence Of General Custom Or Right, When Relevant.
BSA

Section 42 – Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) – Opinion As To Existence Of General Custom Or Right, When Relevant.

Apni Law
Last updated: April 23, 2025 5:29 pm
Apni Law
6 months ago
Share
Section 42 - Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) - Opinion As To Existence Of General Custom Or Right, When Relevant
Section 42 - Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) - Opinion As To Existence Of General Custom Or Right, When Relevant
SHARE

Code: Section 42 of Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA)

When the Court has to form an opinion as to the existence of any general custom
or right, the opinions, as to the existence of such custom or right, of persons who would be
likely to know of its existence if it existed, are relevant.

Explanation.—The expression “general custom or right” includes customs or rights
common to any considerable class of persons.

Illustration.
The right of the villagers of a particular village to use the water of a particular well is
a general right within the meaning of this section.


Explanation of Section 42 BSA

Section 42 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) deals with the admissibility of opinions regarding the existence of general customs or rights. When a legal dispute arises and the Court must determine whether a particular custom or communal right exists, it can consider the opinions of individuals who are reasonably expected to know about such customs or rights.

Contents
Code: Section 42 of Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA)Explanation of Section 42 BSAWhat is a “General Custom or Right”?IllustrationCommon Questions and Answers on Section 42 BSAQ1. What qualifies as a “general custom or right” under this section?Q2. Who can give relevant opinions under Section 42?Q3. Is documentary evidence necessary to prove such customs?Q4. Can opinions under Section 42 be challenged in court?Conclusion

This provision is particularly important in contexts where customs or rights are based on tradition or local practices and may not be formally documented.

What is a “General Custom or Right”?

According to the Explanation in Section 42, a “general custom or right” refers to customs or rights that are shared by a large or identifiable group of people—such as villagers, members of a caste or tribe, or residents of a locality. These may include:

  • Customary rights to water, grazing, or passage

  • Communal religious or festival practices

  • Trade or occupational customs among a guild or class


Illustration

Let’s say there is a legal question about whether villagers in a certain area have the right to draw water from a well located on private land. Under Section 42, the court can take into account the opinions of elder villagers, local leaders, or other community members who have lived in the village for a long time and are familiar with traditional practices. Their opinions help establish whether the alleged right actually exists and is recognized as a general custom.


Common Questions and Answers on Section 42 BSA

Q1. What qualifies as a “general custom or right” under this section?

It refers to customs or rights that are widely followed or acknowledged by a considerable class of people, such as villagers, a religious community, or a professional group.

Q2. Who can give relevant opinions under Section 42?

Individuals who are likely to know about the existence of the custom or right due to their experience, social role, or long-term association with the group.

Q3. Is documentary evidence necessary to prove such customs?

Not necessarily. Oral testimony and opinions can be sufficient, especially when the custom is traditional and undocumented.

Q4. Can opinions under Section 42 be challenged in court?

Yes, the other party can cross-examine the witnesses or present contrary evidence to dispute the claimed custom or right.


Conclusion

Section 42 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam plays a vital role in legal proceedings involving unwritten rights and long-standing customs. It allows courts to consider community knowledge and lived experience when deciding such matters. This section is essential for preserving the relevance of traditional practices within the modern legal system.

For more in-depth legal explanations and bare act analysis, explore more sections on ApniLaw.

You Might Also Like

Section 135 – Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) – Production Of Title-Deeds Of Witness Not A Party.

Section 34 – Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) – Previous Judgments Relevant To Bar A Second Suit Or Trial.

Section 71 – Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) – Proof Of Document Not Required By Law To Be Attested.

Section 60 – Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) – Cases In Which Secondary Evidence Relating To Documents Maybe Given.

Section 7 – Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) – Facts Necessary To Explain Or Introduce Fact In Issue Or Relevant Facts.

Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article High Court of Madhya Pradesh Father-in-law Has The Right To Evict His Son-in-law From His Property: Madhya Pradesh HC
Next Article Supreme Court of India Woman Can Claim Maintenance from Second Husband Even If First Marriage Was Not Legally Dissolved: Supreme Court
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Supreme Court Urges Madhya Pradesh High Court To Reconsider Termination Of Female Judges
News

Supreme Court Urges Madhya Pradesh High Court To Reconsider Termination Of Female Judges

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
1 year ago
Supreme Court To Review Alleged Flaws In Punjab & Haryana Judicial Service Exam
Supreme Court Grants Bail To Ashutosh Garg In ₹1,032 Crore GST Fraud Case
Live-in Relationships Go Against “Settled Law in Indian Middle Class Society.”, Allahabad HC
Call Detail Records Insufficient for Conviction Under NDPS Act: J&K High Court
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Cheque Bounce - Negotiable Instruments Act 1881

Defenses Available In Cheque Bounce Cases: How An Accused Can Fight

Cheque Bounce - Negotiable Instruments Act 1881

Difference Between Civil Recovery and Criminal Action in Cheque Bounce Cases Under Negotiable Instruments Act

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?