By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Section 135 – Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) – Production Of Title-Deeds Of Witness Not A Party.
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > Bare Act > BSA > Section 135 – Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) – Production Of Title-Deeds Of Witness Not A Party.
BSA

Section 135 – Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) – Production Of Title-Deeds Of Witness Not A Party.

Apni Law
Last updated: April 17, 2025 11:21 pm
Apni Law
5 months ago
Share
Section 135 - Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) - Production Of Title-Deeds Of Witness Not A Party
Section 135 - Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) - Production Of Title-Deeds Of Witness Not A Party
SHARE

Code: Section 135 BSA

No witness who is not a party to a suit shall be compelled to produce his
title-deeds to any property, or any document in virtue of which he holds any property as
pledgee or mortgagee or any document the production of which might tend to criminate
him, unless he has agreed in writing to produce them with the person seeking the production
of such deeds or some person through whom he claims.


Explanation of Section 135 BSA

Section 135 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) safeguards non-party witnesses by preventing them from being forced to disclose sensitive documents. This includes:

Contents
Code: Section 135 BSAExplanation of Section 135 BSAIllustrationsExample 1: Title-Deeds of PropertyExample 2: Mortgage DocumentsExample 3: Self-IncriminationCommon Questions and Answers on Section 135 BSA1. Can a non-party witness be forced to produce title-deeds?2. Does Section 135 prevent self-incrimination for witnesses?3. What happens if a witness refuses to provide documents?Conclusion
  1. Title-deeds of any property they own.
  2. Documents associated with properties they hold as pledgee or mortgagee.
  3. Documents that could incriminate them.

However, if the witness agrees in writing, they may provide such documents voluntarily. The person requesting the documents must have obtained the witness’s written consent. This section ensures that non-party witnesses are not pressured into revealing confidential information that could harm their interests.


Illustrations

Example 1: Title-Deeds of Property

A witness, C, who is not a party in the case, is asked to present their property’s title-deeds. C cannot be forced to provide these documents unless they consent in writing.

Example 2: Mortgage Documents

Witness D, who is a mortgagee, is requested to provide documents related to the mortgage. D cannot be compelled to share these documents without prior written consent.

Example 3: Self-Incrimination

E is called to provide documents that might lead to self-incrimination. Under Section 135, E is protected and cannot be forced to disclose such materials.


Common Questions and Answers on Section 135 BSA

1. Can a non-party witness be forced to produce title-deeds?

  • Answer: No, a non-party witness cannot be compelled to produce title-deeds or any related documents unless they give written consent.

2. Does Section 135 prevent self-incrimination for witnesses?

  • Answer: Yes, this section protects witnesses from being forced to disclose documents that could incriminate them.

3. What happens if a witness refuses to provide documents?

  • Answer: The witness cannot be forced to provide the documents unless they have agreed in writing to do so.

Conclusion

Section 135 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) ensures that non-party witnesses are protected from being compelled to disclose sensitive documents, including title-deeds and documents that could lead to self-incrimination. The provision requires the witness’s written consent before disclosure, safeguarding their privacy and rights during legal proceedings.

You Might Also Like

Section 48 – Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) – Evidence Of Character Or Previous Sexual Experience Not Relevant In Certain Cases.

Section 90 – Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) – Presumption As To Electronic Messages.

Section 100 – Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) – . Evidence As To Application Of Language To One Of Two Sets Of Facts, To Neither Of Which The Whole Correctly Applies.

Section 43 – Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) – Opinion As To Usages, Tenets, Etc., When Relevant.

Section 79 – Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) – Presumption As To Documents Produced As Record Of Evidence, Etc.

Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Cinematograph Rules Cinematograph Rules 2024: A Modern Framework for Film Certification
Next Article Section 141 - Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) - Importation Of Girl Or Boy From Foreign Country Section 141 – Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) – Importation Of Girl Or Boy From Foreign Country.
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Supreme Court: NDMC Not Responsible For Staff Absorption After DSGMC School Closure Without Approval
NewsSupreme Court

Past Irregular Promotions Cannot Justify Future Violations: Supreme Court

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
6 months ago
Bail is Rule, Jail is Exception: Supreme Court Upholds In UAPA Case
Supreme Court Rules On Balancing Surety Requirements with Personal Liberty In Multiple Bail Cases
Supreme Court Enforces Stricter Conditions for Tree Felling In Public Projects, Cites Right To Healthy Environment
Supreme Court Grants Bail To Ashish Mishra In Lakhimpur Kheri Violence Case
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Cheque Bounce - Negotiable Instruments Act 1881

Defenses Available In Cheque Bounce Cases: How An Accused Can Fight

Cheque Bounce - Negotiable Instruments Act 1881

Difference Between Civil Recovery and Criminal Action in Cheque Bounce Cases Under Negotiable Instruments Act

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?