By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Section 107 – Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) – Burden Of Proving Fact To Be Proved To Make Evidence Admissible.
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > Bare Act > BSA > Section 107 – Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) – Burden Of Proving Fact To Be Proved To Make Evidence Admissible.
BSA

Section 107 – Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) – Burden Of Proving Fact To Be Proved To Make Evidence Admissible.

Apni Law
Last updated: April 16, 2025 12:11 pm
Apni Law
6 months ago
Share
Section 107 - Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) - Burden Of Proving Fact To Be Proved To Make Evidence Admissible
Section 107 - Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) - Burden Of Proving Fact To Be Proved To Make Evidence Admissible
SHARE

Code: Section 107 Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023

The burden of proving any fact necessary to be proved in order to enable any
person to give evidence of any other fact is on the person who wishes to give such
evidence.
Illustrations.
(a) A wishes to prove a dying declaration by B. A must prove B’s death.
(b) A wishes to prove, by secondary evidence, the contents of a lost document. A
must prove that the document has been lost.


Explanation of Section 107 BSA

Section 107 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 focuses on the foundational facts that must be proven before certain types of evidence can be admitted in court.

Contents
Code: Section 107 Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023Explanation of Section 107 BSAKey Points:IllustrationsCommon Questions and Answers on Section 107 BSAConclusion

This section establishes that if a person wants to submit a piece of evidence that depends on another fact being true, then that preliminary fact must be proven first. In simple terms:

  • Before you introduce certain kinds of evidence, you must first establish the conditions that make it legally acceptable.

This principle maintains the integrity of the trial process by ensuring that only admissible evidence is considered by the court.

Key Points:

  • It deals with “foundational facts” — facts that must be proven before other evidence can be introduced.
  • The burden lies on the person who wants to present the dependent evidence.
  • The section ensures that evidence isn’t admitted prematurely or without justification.

Illustrations

Let’s understand the official examples:

(a) A wishes to prove a dying declaration made by B.
→ Before presenting the dying declaration as evidence, A must first prove that B is dead. This is because the admissibility of a dying declaration depends on the declarant being deceased.

(b) A wants to introduce the contents of a lost document by using a copy or secondary evidence.
→ A must prove that the original document is indeed lost before the court allows the secondary evidence.

These illustrations make it clear that some types of evidence are only admissible when a necessary condition (a preliminary fact) is first established.


Common Questions and Answers on Section 107 BSA

  1. What is a “foundational fact” in the context of Section 107?
    • A foundational fact is a preliminary fact that must be established before certain evidence can be introduced. For example, to admit a dying declaration, the fact of death must be established first.
  2. Who bears the burden of proving such foundational facts?
    • The person who wishes to present the main evidence bears the burden of proving the foundational fact that makes it admissible.
  3. What happens if the foundational fact is not proven?
    • If the foundational fact is not proven, the associated evidence becomes inadmissible and cannot be considered by the court.
  4. Does this section apply to all kinds of evidence?
    • No, it specifically applies to types of evidence that are conditional in nature — such as dying declarations, secondary evidence, confessions, etc.
  5. How does this section maintain evidentiary integrity?
    • It ensures that the court only considers evidence that meets the conditions set by law, thus avoiding misuse or premature reliance on unsupported materials.

Conclusion

Section 107 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 plays a crucial role in determining when certain types of evidence can be admitted in court. It enforces the principle that a party must first establish any fact that forms the legal basis for admitting other evidence. This ensures fair trials and prevents the misuse of procedural shortcuts.

Legal professionals must be mindful of this rule when preparing evidence that depends on the existence of prior conditions.

For detailed legal insights and updates on Indian Evidence Law, visit ApniLaw.

You Might Also Like

Section 66 – Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) – Proof As To Electronic Signature.

Section 48 – Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) – Evidence Of Character Or Previous Sexual Experience Not Relevant In Certain Cases.

Section 91 – Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) – Presumption As To Due Execution, Etc., Of Documents Not Produced.

Section 64 – Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) – Rules As To Notice To Produce.

Section 127 – Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) – Judges And Magistrates.

Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article High Court of Karnataka Statements Under Section 161 And 164 CrPC Only Considered In Rare Cases: Karnataka High Court
Next Article Live-in Relationships The Challenges of Regulating Live-in Relationships in India
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Supreme Court Clarifies: Overtaking Alone Doesn't Constitute Rash Or Negligent Driving
News

Supreme Court Clarifies: Overtaking Alone Doesn’t Constitute Rash Or Negligent Driving

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
12 months ago
NGOs Receiving Foreign Contributions Cannot Be Suspected Without Evidence of Misuse: Madras High Court
Must Avoid Recording The Full Name and Address Of POCSO Victims: J&K High Court Orders Immediate Redaction of Rape Victim’s Name
Supreme Court Directs Health Ministry To Expedite Implementation Of NCAHP Act
Gujarat High Court Rebukes Railways Over Lion Deaths from Train Hits
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Cheque Bounce - Negotiable Instruments Act 1881

Defenses Available In Cheque Bounce Cases: How An Accused Can Fight

Cheque Bounce - Negotiable Instruments Act 1881

Difference Between Civil Recovery and Criminal Action in Cheque Bounce Cases Under Negotiable Instruments Act

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?