By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Section 303 – Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) – Theft.
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > Bare Act > BNS > Section 303 – Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) – Theft.
BNS

Section 303 – Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) – Theft.

Apni Law
Last updated: April 5, 2025 10:11 am
Apni Law
4 months ago
Share
Section 303 - Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) - Theft
Section 303 - Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) - Theft
SHARE

Code: Section 303 BNS

(1) Whoever, intending to take dishonestly any movable property out of the
possession of any person without that person’s consent, moves that property in order to
such taking, is said to commit theft.
Explanation 1.—A thing so long as it is attached to the earth, not being movable
property, is not the subject of theft; but it becomes capable of being the subject of theft as
soon as it is severed from the earth.
Explanation 2.—A moving effected by the same act which affects the severance may
be a theft.
Explanation 3.—A person is said to cause a thing to move by removing an obstacle
which prevented it from moving or by separating it from any other thing, as well as by
actually moving it.
Explanation 4.—A person, who by any means causes an animal to move, is said to
move that animal, and to move everything which, in consequence of the motion so caused,
is moved by that animal.
Explanation 5.—The consent mentioned in this section may be express or implied,
and may be given either by the person in possession, or by any person having for that
purpose authority either express or implied.
Illustrations.
(a) A cuts down a tree on Z’s ground, with the intention of dishonestly taking the tree
out of Z’s possession without Z’s consent. Here, as soon as A has severed the tree in order
to such taking, he has committed theft.
(b) A puts a bait for dogs in his pocket, and thus induces Z’s dog to follow it. Here, if
A’s intention be dishonestly to take the dog out of Z’s possession without Z’s consent. A
has committed theft as soon as Z’s dog has begun to follow A.
(c) A meets a bullock carrying a box of treasure. He drives the bullock in a certain
direction, in order that he may dishonestly take the treasure. As soon as the bullock begins
to move, A has committed theft of the treasure.
(d) A being Z’s servant, and entrusted by Z with the care of Z’s plate, dishonestly runs
away with the plate, without Z’s consent. A has committed theft.
(e) Z, going on a journey, entrusts his plate to A, the keeper of a warehouse, till Z shall
return. A carries the plate to a goldsmith and sells it. Here the plate was not in Z’s possession.
It could not therefore be taken out of Z’s possession, and A has not committed theft, though
he may have committed criminal breach of trust.
(f) A finds a ring belonging to Z on a table in the house which Z occupies. Here the ring
is in Z’s possession, and if A dishonestly removes it, A commits theft.
(g) A finds a ring lying on the highroad, not in the possession of any person. A, by
taking it, commits no theft, though he may commit criminal misappropriation of property.
(h) A sees a ring belonging to Z lying on a table in Z’s house. Not venturing to
misappropriate the ring immediately for fear of search and detection, A hides the ring in a
place where it is highly improbable that it will ever be found by Z, with the intention of taking
the ring from the hiding place and selling it when the loss is forgotten. Here A, at the time of
first moving the ring, commits theft.
(i) A delivers his watch to Z, a jeweler, to be regulated. Z carries it to his shop. A, not
owing to the jeweler any debt for which the jeweler might lawfully detain the watch as a
security, enters the shop openly, takes his watch by force out of Z’s hand, and carries it away.
Here A, though he may have committed criminal trespass and assault, has not committed
theft, in as much as what he did was not done dishonestly.
(j) If A owes money to Z for repairing the watch, and if Z retains the watch lawfully as
a security for the debt, and A takes the watch out of Z’s possession, with the intention of
depriving Z of the property as a security for his debt, he commits theft, in as much as he takes
it dishonestly.
(k) Again, if A, having pawned his watch to Z, takes it out of Z’s possession without
Z’s consent, not having paid what he borrowed on the watch, he commits theft, though the
watch is his own property in as much as he takes it dishonestly.
(l) A takes an article belonging to Z out of Z’s possession without Z’s consent, with
the intention of keeping it until he obtains money from Z as a reward for its restoration. Here
A takes dishonestly; A has therefore committed theft.
(m) A, being on friendly terms with Z, goes into Z’s library in Z’s absence, and takes
away a book without Z’s express consent for the purpose merely of reading it, and with the
intention of returning it. Here, it is probable that A may have conceived that he had Z’s
implied consent to use Z’s book. If this was A’s impression, A has not committed theft.
(n) A asks charity from Z’s wife. She gives A money, food and clothes, which A knows
to belong to Z her husband. Here it is probable that A may conceive that Z’s wife is authorised
to give away alms. If this was A’s impression, A has not committed theft.
(o) A is the paramour of Z’s wife. She gives a valuable property, which A knows to
belong to her husband Z, and to be such property as she has no authority from Z to give. If
A takes the property dishonestly, he commits theft.
(p) A, in good faith, believing property belonging to Z to be A’s own property, takes
that property out of Z’s possession. Here, as A does not take dishonestly, he does not
commit theft.
(2) Whoever commits theft shall be punished with imprisonment of either description
for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both and in case of second
or subsequent conviction of any person under this section, he shall be punished with
rigorous imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than one year but which may extend
to five years and with fine:
Provided that in cases of theft where the value of the stolen property is less than five
thousand rupees, and a person is convicted for the first time, shall upon return of the value
of property or restoration of the stolen property, shall be punished with community service.

Contents
Code: Section 303 BNSExplanation:IllustrationsPunishment for TheftCommon Questions and Answers1. What is considered ‘theft’?2. Is taking property accidentally theft?3. Can I be punished for taking my own property back?4. What if the property is abandoned?5. What is ‘criminal breach of trust’ vs. ‘theft’?Conclusion

Explanation:

  1. Severance from Earth:
    A thing attached to the earth is not theft until it is severed.
    • Example: Cutting down a tree to steal timber.
  2. Movement Equals Theft:
    Moving an item with the same act as severing it is considered theft.
    • Example: Cutting a tree to take it away.
  3. Causing Movement:
    Even indirect movement, like removing an obstacle, counts as theft.
    • Example: Removing a fence to drive away a car.
  4. Animals:
    If you cause an animal to move, you are said to have moved the animal.
    • Example: Driving a bullock carrying goods to steal the goods.
  5. Consent:
    • Can be express (spoken) or implied (understood).
    • Given by the owner or someone authorized.

Illustrations

  • (a) A cuts down Z’s tree intending to steal it. (Theft)
  • (b) A lures Z’s dog with bait, intending to steal the dog. (Theft)
  • (c) A drives a bullock carrying treasure to steal the treasure. (Theft)
  • (d) A, Z’s servant, runs away with Z’s plate without consent. (Theft)
  • (e) A sells Z’s plate (entrusted for safekeeping) without Z’s consent. (Not Theft, but criminal breach of trust)
  • (f) A takes Z’s ring from the table (Z’s possession). (Theft)
  • (g) A finds a ring on the road, not belonging to anyone. (No Theft, but criminal misappropriation)
  • (h) A hides Z’s ring to sell later. (Theft when first moved)
  • (i) A forcefully takes his watch from Z without consent. (Not Theft, but assault and trespass)
  • (j) A takes a pawned watch without paying back the debt. (Theft)
  • (k) A takes back his own pawned watch without permission. (Theft)
  • (l) A keeps Z’s property demanding a reward for return. (Theft)
  • (m) A takes Z’s book without consent, intending to return it. (No Theft if implied consent exists)
  • (n) A receives alms from Z’s wife (if she had authority). (No Theft)
  • (o) A receives property from Z’s wife, knowing it belongs to Z. (Theft if taken dishonestly)
  • (p) A takes property believing it’s his own by mistake. (No Theft if not dishonest)

Punishment for Theft

  1. First Conviction:
    • Imprisonment: Up to 3 years, or
    • Fine, or
    • Both.
  2. Second or Subsequent Conviction:
    • Rigorous Imprisonment: 1 to 5 years, plus
    • Fine.
  3. Special Provision (for theft < ₹5,000):
    • First-time offenders may be sentenced to community service upon returning the stolen property.

Common Questions and Answers

1. What is considered ‘theft’?

Answer: Taking someone’s movable property without their consent and with dishonest intent.

2. Is taking property accidentally theft?

Answer: No. Theft requires deliberate intent to dishonestly take property.

3. Can I be punished for taking my own property back?

Answer: Yes, if you take it without proper consent, like in cases of pawned items.

4. What if the property is abandoned?

Answer: Not theft if it’s truly abandoned with no owner. But, misappropriation might still apply.

5. What is ‘criminal breach of trust’ vs. ‘theft’?

Answer:

  • Theft: Taking property without consent.
  • Breach of Trust: Taking property entrusted to you with the intention to dishonestly convert it.

Conclusion

Section 303 BNS aims to safeguard personal property rights by defining theft clearly, focusing on dishonest intent and consent. It balances punishments with considerations for first-time offenders and value of stolen property.

You Might Also Like

Section 28 – Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) – Consent Known To Be Given Under Fear Or Misconception.

Section 15 – Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) – Act Of Judge When Acting Judicially.

Section 64 – Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) – Punishment For Rape.

Section 272 – Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) – Malignant Act Likely To Spread Infection Of Disease Dangerous To Life.

Section 330 – Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) – House-Trespass And Hous-Ebreaking.

Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Understanding The Insolvency And Bankruptcy Code Banks Can Invoke SARFAESI If Not Party to Resolution Plan: Kerala High Court
Next Article Environmental Pollution How Can Individuals And Organizations Be Held Liable For Environmental Pollution?
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
CJI Chandrachud Calls For Inclusive Policies For Persons With Disabilities
News

CJI Chandrachud Calls For Inclusive Policies For Persons With Disabilities

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
11 months ago
Supreme Court Swears In Justices Singh And Mahadevan, Enhancing Bench Diversity
Impeachment of the President of India – Procedure, Grounds & Constitutional Provisions
College Canteen Run By Educational Trust Must Register Under KVAT Act: Kerala HC
No Need to Prove Negligence for Compensation Under Section 163-A: Punjab & Haryana High Court
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

6-Week Deadline For States on Transgender Welfare Boards: Warns Supreme Court

Who Is Recognized as a Transgender Person Under Indian Law? (Section 2(k))

6-Week Deadline For States on Transgender Welfare Boards: Warns Supreme Court

How to Appeal Rejection of a Transgender Certificate (Section 7)

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?